From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toon Claes via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13479: Cross Compiling for ARM Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:10:36 +0100 Message-ID: <87cyu9fhwn.fsf@iotcl.com> References: <34DD1295-A6F6-4757-9828-BC61D23E2D8E@iotcl.net> <87h6jl4dmn.fsf@yahoo.com> Reply-To: Toon Claes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , Toon Claes , 9192-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 13479-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 14:51:16 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYzC-0000Fx-P7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 14:51:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYz4-0001Oq-Sx; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYz2-0001Kr-IY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYz2-0005jG-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:51:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYz0-0003DE-89 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Toon Claes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 13479-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13479.170489463212295 (code D ref 13479); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13479-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2024 13:50:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYyW-0003CF-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:50:32 -0500 Original-Received: from out-187.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::bb]:12006) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNYyU-0003C0-IJ for 13479-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 08:50:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iotcl.com; s=key1; t=1704892581; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=7E24Xtbj9SObgXxSxxEsGt16XlIhNi7BVItnhNUVl8E=; b=LPbY1pD2Iib+kHfR5VqIV45YcksVekFV4zNT/GQX+PJT08oYlEpBewsXA1M+ywvQp1wvWJ tNWiepD8b0GR0vGw+AhXS5gpcSzC/gmv0EMEWui2q89eYlxL6EuAkfbKl5cddZXlibKVmh eZR/IQ1AXrGlfYWmH9Q4Mn2/kZbdgqo= X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-reply-to: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277742 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: >>> That was 12 years ago. I'm therefore reaching out to ask if this bug is >>> still relevant, or if it has since been fixed? I don't know if the issue still exists, and I have no way to test it. But I also assume it is no longer an issue, and agree to close this issue. Thanks for cleaning up this old bug report. -- Toon