From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7001: should `byte-compile-from-buffer' evaluate `binary-overwrite-mode' explicitly? Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:11:13 -0400 Message-ID: <87bp7cjilq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286062909 7157 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2010 23:41:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7001@debbugs.gnu.org, MON KEY To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 03 01:41:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Bi7-0003zO-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 01:41:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P2Bi6-0003fK-Py for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:41:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45923 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P2Bhx-0003eV-Qq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:41:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Bhw-0002gL-Kf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Bhw-0002gH-Gf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:41:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2BCP-0006SB-UW; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 23:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7001 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7001-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7001.128606089424776 (code B ref 7001); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 23:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7001) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2010 23:08:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2BBd-0006RZ-Pm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:08:13 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po16.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.72]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2BBc-0006RU-5R for 7001@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (173-9-75-145-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.9.75.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po16.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o92NBDko011040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4FFA9C018; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:11:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:02:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:09:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40649 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Has this form: >> (setq overwrite-mode 'overwrite-mode-binary) >> Should this evalatate `binary-overwrite-mode' from simple.el instead? > > Probably not, since that would run binary-overwrite-mode-hook. I've added a comment about this. > Most likely this line can be removed from bytecomp.el. The comments in bytecomp.el say this is needed for DOS. No harm leaving it in, I suppose.