From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: claudio.bley@gmail.com (Claudio Bley) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8080: 24.0.50; Sending mail failed with Gmail/GnuTLS on Windows Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87bp202by1.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> References: <864o80zgns.fsf@gmail.com> <84ipwco382.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <86oc63sisu.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwrejuee.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298660828 5049 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2011 19:07:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:07:08 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 25 20:07:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt30G-0005o7-LH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 20:07:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pt30C-0007T0-TX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:06:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60250 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pt305-0007RW-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt304-0005KA-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt304-0005K6-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2d4-0000ST-6V; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: claudio.bley@gmail.com (Claudio Bley) Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8080 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12986593761748 (code B ref -1); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2011 18:42:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2cx-0000S9-Nk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2cv-0000Ru-2Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2cl-0001JX-Ad for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:48958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2cl-0001JO-8K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55763 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pt2cg-0006cY-As for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2ca-0001GH-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:54564) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2ca-0001FB-Ih for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:42:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt2cX-0007cE-U5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:42:29 +0100 Original-Received: from dslb-188-106-012-040.pools.arcor-ip.net ([188.106.12.40]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:42:29 +0100 Original-Received: from claudio.bley by dslb-188-106-012-040.pools.arcor-ip.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:42:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dslb-188-106-012-040.pools.arcor-ip.net In-Reply-To: <87fwrejuee.fsf@lifelogs.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?Q?Goj=C5=8D?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mail-Copies-To: never X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:43:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44370 Archived-At: At Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:47:05 -0600, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:13:16 +0100 claudio.bley@gmail.com (Claudio Bley) wrote: > > CB> At Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:20:33 -0700, > CB> Christoph wrote: > >> > >> How soon can we expect these changes you talk about? > > CB> Since I experimented with a few things the code needs some cleanup / > CB> polishing now. I'll try to submit a patch next weekend. > > That's terrific. Thank you for working on that. > > Are you interested in adding support for the more recent versions of > GnuTLS as well (2.10+)? I stopped with the one generally available in > Debian at the time (see > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75001). It's on my > TODO list to upgrade to 2.10 and add callbacks for certificate > verification, but if you want to try it I would be grateful. Actually, I'm using GnuTLS 2.10 (2.10.1 and 2.10.4) right now. What are the differences between 2.8 and 2.10? I would be glad to help out implementing the missing callback support. Incidently, I had a car crash yesterday. Nothing serious, still feeling a bit dizzy, though. That probably means I won't have any time preparing a patch this weekend. So, don't hold your breath on it... Claudio