From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8793: 24.0.50; doc strings of timer-activate(-when-idle) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:46:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87boyd6wqg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1307227645 21193 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2011 22:47:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8793@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 05 00:47:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcm-0006OH-Qs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 00:47:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcl-0006vU-NX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcW-0006v4-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcU-0001sJ-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcU-0001sE-M8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzcT-0000bl-Uc; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8793 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8793-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8793.13072275992296 (code B ref 8793); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8793) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2011 22:46:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzc7-0000az-Lj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QSzc5-0000an-Oz for 8793@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:46:38 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([64.134.101.122]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p54MkV3u002107 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:46:32 -0400 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3382F16051D; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:46:31 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:35:44 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:47:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46960 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > 1. In `timer-activate', arg IDLE is not described at all. Looks like an oversight; I've removed this argument. > 2. In both functions, "the meaning of REUSE-CELL is quite mysterious". Fixed, thanks.