From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11460: 24.1.50; doc string of `assert' Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 20:17:06 -0800 Message-ID: <87bnyggbst.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <796323B5CCA7479C83BB0DD5B731553A@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391919548 23344 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2014 04:19:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 04:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11460@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 09 05:19:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrP-0005yZ-Fh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:19:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49137 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrP-0000eN-0e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrH-0000e5-E6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrC-0003eG-Fd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrC-0003eB-CW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLrC-000192-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11460 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11460-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11460.13919195184363 (code B ref 11460); Sun, 09 Feb 2014 04:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11460) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2014 04:18:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58771 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLqn-00018I-Kl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:18:38 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLqm-00018B-EL for 11460@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 23:18:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WCLqS-0005Au-JX; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 05:18:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <796323B5CCA7479C83BB0DD5B731553A@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 12 May 2012 08:06:04 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WCLqS-0005Au-JX MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392524297.2843@dfqa8bFuyhF2DX42XGkpHA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85040 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > "Second arg SHOW-ARGS means to include arguments of FORM in message." > > How so? Which values of SHOW-ARGS mean that? > > And what on earth are the "arguments" of FORM? FORM is presumably a sexp, which > is evaluated and returns nil or non-nil. A sexp does not have "arguments". > > It's not at all clear what you mean here. Looking at the code, I'm still not sure what the meaning here is. (let ((sargs (and show-args (delq nil (mapcar (lambda (x) (unless (macroexp-const-p x) x)) (cdr form)))))) So... if the elements in the rest of FORM evaluate to the same value, they're included in the error output, but if not, not? Uhm... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/