From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21104: 25.0.50; relative paths are added to load-path without -nsl (bug#21104) Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:16:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87bna0x0tl.fsf@igel.home> References: <83mvtmcau2.fsf@gnu.org> <9aoae1wx8m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h9jtc4eo.fsf@gnu.org> <8337vcdej9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449598710 19328 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 18:18:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esq@lawlist.com, andlind@gmail.com, 21104@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 19:18:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mq4-0003JY-26 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:18:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mq3-0002Bp-EF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mpz-0002Be-Ln for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mpu-0000j0-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mpu-0000is-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mpu-0001R1-8U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:18:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21104-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21104.14495986225435 (code B ref 21104); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21104) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Dec 2015 18:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mow-0001PN-0A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a6Mot-0001P7-Kh for 21104@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:17:00 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Original-Received: from relay2.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A84AD43; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 18:16:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Yow: Didn't I buy a 1951 Packard from you last March in Cairo? In-Reply-To: <8337vcdej9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:40:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109784 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe I'm blind, but my reading of the code in init_lread indicates > that it does make a difference: > > Lisp_Object sitelisp; > sitelisp = decode_env_path (0, PATH_SITELOADSEARCH, 0); > if (! NILP (sitelisp)) Vload_path = nconc2 (sitelisp, Vload_path); > > My reading of this is that if we call decode_env_path with last > argument non-zero, it will return nil, and Vload_path will not be > modified by adding anything. What am I missing? decode_env_path never returns nil. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."