From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14086: 24.3.50; `substitute-command-keys': inappropriate "(that binding is currently shadowed by another mode)" Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:26:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn4sbnxt.fsf@gnus.org> References: <0FF2F801815441C3B5385CE3202E16A0@us.oracle.com> <878tzx2vth.fsf@gnus.org> <87oa8sy6rt.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461932930 16039 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 12:28:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14086@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 14:28:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7X3-00033A-VW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:28:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54034 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7X0-0003ua-8e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:28:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Wr-0003jl-2o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:28:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Wf-0008UE-DW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Wf-0008Tt-Ac for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Wb-0005lS-RB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14086 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14086.146193283122087 (code B ref 14086); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 12:27:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54032 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Vj-0005k8-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:53452) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7Vd-0005je-VG for 14086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 08:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw7VX-0006r1-2i; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:27:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87oa8sy6rt.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:49:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117153 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> "Drew Adams" writes: >> >> > M-r previous-matching-history-element >> > (that binding is currently shadowed by another mode) > > I guess this happens because `minibuffer-local-completion-map', where > Drew made the binding, has as parent map `minibuffer-local-map', whose > binding (indeed) gets shadowed. > > Dunno whether the different ways of shadowing can be easily > distinguished. But I agree that the wording is misleading. > > Maybe we should just say "that binding is currently shadowed". Or "(this binding is currently shadowed)"? The "that" is the oddest part of the sentence. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no