From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tino Calancha Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25115: 26.0.50; ibuffer fails to show confirmation buffer when there are side windows Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 19:20:17 +0900 Message-ID: <87bmwp5pge.fsf@gmail.com> References: <921d3030-33fa-b1df-1fa9-d2a3e9b1c56b@gmail.com> <584517C7.8040604@gmx.at> <58453E86.3060206@gmx.at> <87shq25s7j.fsf@udel.edu> <584594B6.4010400@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481019685 12285 195.159.176.226 (6 Dec 2016 10:21:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 10:21:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mark Oteiza , Liu Hui , 25115@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 11:21:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cECs9-0002N8-A2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 11:21:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47531 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cECsD-0001Mc-8H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cECry-0001Iq-1C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cECru-0003mH-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cECrt-0003mD-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cECrt-0005wA-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tino Calancha Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25115.148101963122773 (code B ref 25115); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 10:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2016 10:20:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cECrP-0005vF-6M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:35418) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cECrN-0005v2-AI for 25115@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 05:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id p66so19468454pga.2 for <25115@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 02:20:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NKm8qR6wxcCN1WCQozSHkKhPdtqUIsI07rkE0zXuh5I=; b=xej8htNrJBejKWggC4Flo4T18ccbNeFWja0zPdsQQAyKj5tGnr3xrd1PPr4TbxjfBu gRmbzqIpCRUjDkEyVAwX0a34PkoCzjTRhHkMWTACmIslLW140DxCy2LaGE72t6SzuR8S Wq50t9tC+05dlwKlx/Xm6L1WRDgJv7tjsJE+6D7mHhblJENMf89VyTze9uDZDTYohZyA xj3opmgMkw8k3vnxPxgJygFq53oVc95R2fk1PjU+Sz/V04iWCwrvQRrlWpWzr3XDDiFO L3n9QgJV9UUDYtlx3b3YKr50/Q02kP0IDx4jxDhlluA1xdeqlCdY+dutCRXJE1ilNMUA Bwwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NKm8qR6wxcCN1WCQozSHkKhPdtqUIsI07rkE0zXuh5I=; b=OcBxGPbZYskSfthtLESyKsHrEkmY77jfyU8teZCtc3xB3pvkKK5N/08HjksI4W1UUJ yt0zvSFYr23jrM3SkQKLVrs715/mfK9yr3f8e4Ch0XAVSnmXCHQpKS68ScmXnEBCigij ycoRe3Ihn5OItL7+kQ0CN44Tg1JKAvLnDCN62AF5IMbutQOBxs9aL/x8B17XFofaRDkJ +uubETawgVPTWotcyGNiyd74iWRwQ7OSbqWCiiYJdrfv4CGpEkEtxFdS7OiWVq5F2lMt +hcYHDSOrprT8e+b22KK1cJnO4ZSRrRAlwdgdI5edq79rBhzcg/72vaxgWHDR1x3fqig c8Pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03QN6gwguez1JTInElvsnKgTygUiWMT/H28+jvn8yN8xklt7MwzISIBj+SN8NJAvg== X-Received: by 10.84.215.148 with SMTP id l20mr134830844pli.120.1481019623428; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 02:20:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from calancha-pc (pl676.nas813.p-iwate.nttpc.ne.jp. [124.154.237.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t89sm33659346pfe.50.2016.12.06.02.20.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2016 02:20:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <584594B6.4010400@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:24:22 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126550 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> I don't use ibuffer often, but I have been changing instances of >> switch-to-buffer to pop-to-buffer-same-window since reading Bug#22244. >> >> Makes me wonder about switch-to-buffer's future > > ibuffer apparently uses the last window in =E2=80=98window-list=E2=80=99 = to show the > buffer at the bottom of the frame, something =E2=80=98display-buffer-at-b= ottom=E2=80=99 > should handle well. But I'd like to hear the opinion of a long time > user of =E2=80=98ibuffer=E2=80=99 before actually changing this. Your patch has perfect sense to me. Indeed i wrote an almost identical fix but you were faster than me. Regards, Tino