From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:31:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmwn6hul.fsf@petton.fr> References: <20161207.090954.2116981160523579782.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <87h96g5dlu.fsf@petton.fr> <87vauwghyb.fsf@gmail.com> <87eg1k5951.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481113943 3240 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2016 12:32:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25129@debbugs.gnu.org, 25129-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 13:32:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOV-0000M9-Q6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:32:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38167 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOZ-0003Gx-Rd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45513) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOK-0003BW-9X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:32:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOE-000657-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOE-000650-Kj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbOE-00046W-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25129 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25129-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25129.148111390115475 (code B ref 25129); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 12:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 12:31:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbNs-00041J-Sz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:31:41 -0500 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:52843) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEbNr-0003to-53; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 07:31:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1481113892; bh=iQ4+/jBkPOeWN+XpWlc9z/1j6B7HsOqGMT12SBBzazo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pQzbQdcViaJBmvEMy1zo3ppScwE7hFU/suyrMjrcrHAY423ZOK5KS1/XONxZp3Cb8xMpAh21anig7vN0vbX9ZaA/+bm/yPFhn7bncfRgDByRExC677N8HWpcGDhQTAoQnCO6OgbADDKBXlcxFSBMZtJl3qXiGG8Sa6TMBIJZdlA= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126602 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Tino Calancha writes: > The first line with the repetition of 'non-nil' sounds a little poetic. > How about? > Return non-nil if PRED is satisfied for at least one element of SEQUENCE. > If so, return the first non-nil value returned by PRED. Is poetic bad? ;-) I'll apply your version, so I'm closing this issue. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYSAEiAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQ5+sIAM4u3helayrbJi3RKr81GDh4 ykwk9lgXMnHTPuZdHe42yz7xRM5mlr7USWVsRka2MbWfRvyk4qgPPtgb31sLbduu Nh6lTgJWzOecgiyJShkS9y5FKrUbIKRNh2Eq9JJNE0kkiHBzSPoZtHe3P5XyuIKz HWUuComeQik5F091zt41i3P598FEmfB49vM4odJeKt/6bgu2m06rLZ+QdXvhOdGB oPFsk9sz/5i6M/MypGHKzmjCFneoTLLD1sOVU943sywQ9PgtAwRouZF5ZvRqXJ51 4tgvzKJtF4ApU70G7v/SXwzYK0CIYeALlOk0hdpseIWraUcVRTcLrFIWKRSZXtQ= =vK+S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--