From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22000: Patch addressing the menu-bar frame-resize interaction Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:25:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87bm7qjnke.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k2p8h1vn.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <5BBF93CF.4060301@gmx.at> <5BC05EEB.9010609@gmx.at> <5BC0E405.90805@gmx.at> <5BC1AAE2.7070808@gmx.at> <5BC4DB0E.3050501@gmx.at> <5BC6E4F2.2030607@gmx.at> <5BC83F03.4050006@gmx.at> <83pnw7qsxu.fsf@gnu.org> <5BC8B792.3080806@gmx.at> <83efcnqj4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1me4ct7.fsf@gmail.com> <83zhvapcp9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1539941054 16185 195.159.176.226 (19 Oct 2018 09:24:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, vivek@etla.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 19 11:24:10 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR0p-00044k-Vt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:24:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR2u-0001aQ-U1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:26:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR2l-0001ZF-8a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR2g-00017p-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:26:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR2g-00017U-76 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR2f-0001ll-VL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22000 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22000-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22000.15399411156740 (code B ref 22000); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22000) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2018 09:25:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR1v-0001ke-5y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:25:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:42711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gDR1t-0001kP-SD for 22000@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 05:25:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id r17-v6so4295188wrt.9 for <22000@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 02:25:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=DuHDnqZRbL6kNbDLSbfzXdSCxvRSbISqRRclpbRg1E4=; b=tEzYwCYZSr4sP0xDOlMriGs/pZH4GSMtlvBkw8CV6bE+KwGJQlSZRwMHeRUomUJVPL DajynsDyOpObGzXS1DAQ6q3M8xmGIFUo4RLlmE96oNONVDMVn1qBB3ME6yFX3BGVsxOj hK8UCI25ZPcw8qVw4bilYtdHt1bljrSF7VgjPU8DkyWg9wGK+3uzwERbkBgbQFJuuV/h qswxA1oyWv8gABW2wJGPDEqfs9y1/RrN/QtQA5p4nIKs1uB5pASd/W0XzalA1VuxxGOA 5FbWErWfmLa9dy2aWLoks4C9k79OokX4MPj3+YD9XW0ytNCTdRnBkxiE/xI4fzpf1VTz AvXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=DuHDnqZRbL6kNbDLSbfzXdSCxvRSbISqRRclpbRg1E4=; b=D62tXr6rqU3ojNsOuiMJU2P3gPMna06Ln1noCBmjs/9hPAMt04RVGeJMjHd0iOxBOi y1/r3Mqk4o4jC//ZOQEMK6eMw5QUWnTHpcrm0HEZ3dPYmK9kp6/8nPyUELBLKPmihToD YxxudP+TVxBZGDo9EORlXADqJ78tpWUz9hoVX2WnBsQSRrRQ0J2jPYC+MBi9ZAnPafrY 977C798yRTQfElR7rAVvPVr3RDOEcSEbxG/6CKIoJecAi4mB4mRRo00loOsMcvofj5Bo NPjRzK9ZWADDyJqZl+PhBU0AIrd6tGT2JAiQv8N0x5OTnVL5V7WSzZcJU4i2lgDEPPBx yi0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoi+7M4RuF3SvTmJ0lSZWUH9QPkVWv7ujySCvExkQdONFTYHkLcj CJEYDrIMr5SZ67VfkubkGYY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63BwuPz1COsNAxnv2i8J5vrX94qCbhsSqiBX5IAK1NIBCHz8T0cOJ2cmWWXl4hXLztB9hXmNQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:568b:: with SMTP id f11-v6mr7776877wrv.301.1539941107927; Fri, 19 Oct 2018 02:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu (vav06-1-78-207-202-134.fbx.proxad.net. [78.207.202.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o201-v6sm4170706wmg.16.2018.10.19.02.25.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 19 Oct 2018 02:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <83zhvapcp9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2018 11:23:14 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:151434 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 22000@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de >> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 09:26:28 +0200 >> >> In favour of putting it on emacs-26 is that it resolves the spewing of >> >> Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_distribute_natural_allocation: assertion >> 'extra_space >= 0' failed >> >> when I run emacs with GDK scaling. > > Thanks. I understand the advantages of the changeset, what I'm not > sure about is whether these advantages outweigh the danger in putting > such non-trivial changes on the release branch. The glitches reported > by you and others just in the last two days seem to indicate that we > will be in for more surprises, don't you think? Yes. From painful experience various versions of GTK have different behaviours that aren't detected until the changes are more widely deployed (but you know that :-) ) Robert