From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36712: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; nnimap unconditionally setting marks in a loop) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:26:34 -0700 Message-ID: <87blxhhq51.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87k1cg4086.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87blxigmfe.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="82763"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 36712@debbugs.gnu.org, 36712-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 25 21:27:13 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOS-000LP3-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 21:27:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35084 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOR-00073y-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOO-00072d-Pw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOM-0006xY-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59880) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOI-0006wC-IL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjOI-0001OW-CM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36712 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36712-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36712.15640828055321 (code B ref 36712); Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36712) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2019 19:26:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40468 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjO0-0001Ng-RF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:52222 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hqjNy-0001NN-Kb; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (c-73-254-86-141.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [73.254.86.141]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AABCFA097; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:26:36 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2019 19:03:58 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163736 Archived-At: On 07/25/19 19:03 PM, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Well, I'm fairly sure now this is the right thing to do. I'll leave this >> open for a few more days, then push a fix. > > I think your patch looks correct... Okay, I went ahead and pushed it. Thanks!