From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34343: [PATCH] Make project--find-regexp-in-files work with remote files Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87blrsz3tf.fsf@gmx.de> References: <9d65284f-7a64-5e9c-ab02-fbbd1be41689@yandex.ru> <87r2bt1tio.fsf@gmx.de> <2cfd53b2-8202-a321-a853-da0c949b0f15@yandex.ru> <6cf8bfa8-3873-d3db-9139-854359027e8a@yandex.ru> <87h81mqiq5.fsf@gmx.de> <0ff03b20-20d8-b6c0-c876-3fd525586180@yandex.ru> <87mubdps6s.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="229910"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Felici=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A9meth?= , 34343@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 28 19:47:33 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH7Y-000xc0-RF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:47:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45536 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH7X-0003tJ-Ft for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:47:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60147) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH79-0003t7-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:47:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH78-0007Id-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:47:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH78-0007G9-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH78-0007gJ-C0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 18:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34343 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 34343-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34343.157755877629474 (code B ref 34343); Sat, 28 Dec 2019 18:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34343) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2019 18:46:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58901 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH6N-0007fJ-5b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:46:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:34493) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ilH6K-0007f5-OT for 34343@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 13:46:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1577558766; bh=n/2hVLh5NYuKSZ3SxIwl4Em7iIdpbVUrt/7TnsqkQXw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZoMpQLrF6LXiC3J6u+56DBZTxlDn1sTpqDaXpdVN4ZRASBzcQsrNLDIMeO+4ntMH6 oL1WgR0YMT+4u8JDZMbjwjbUFq98s38unI/1tXq2AXSABoGHkQq44KpCA4vEyXfY0c xWY1fjsWTml6/+RESzjwMHgk1Z3jOUCPYi0xX3Iw= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.60.58]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MsYqv-1jdNt03m8p-00tzjy; Sat, 28 Dec 2019 19:46:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 28 Dec 2019 17:46:07 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:cIGVXpi+1Iq20xxQaOK3oI+cbFb2da/IUFax1b7DHWdT8ysxJGB PHBnKLNytbZ+aHY4/rrvHvftzQpSjW1hQFCSXzZX2Lh0saOIzMKNWXzUTv9HvO999aUUy3+ aeSFjpGmTBy9sDfZ6RenD5Ev4o/p6fN6qojcIGOzU6xXryQq1ldCJkb75k4Px6gsUootLv3 imNdGF1gWOPJEX4WVPDPg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:jTWC87FkmQI=:njlVrPBppzwRasodFcZRbI DJw1x1m9bPSOVb9aSE9a6Ivw7yxnWSR4D06M6/wa98YQ5Jh5KaN8Fcro2qv0AP/8gtucoRgCS dN8Paf8J3C9X96NHqYFco5d0DbMQ5rWZqlsBMipsCGfFgVqlSABHKjsPmhaNJwd5W5kjHtcoy ZIwZdBJjKlEGNzrxxCU/6Wu/tql4nu/8Dibgnom0tCKvV6n7bsFMgKUUFrm60Ab2u/wssjce9 b5DY5OHrIUycVPqZPtLBguSiIR0mg7z78BaO7Kl0mO1hBwcsA2Cs877pdQLlUnkkJZjecb/LQ auuPJuRSzeONDy6gTx2kvCUfCF7k7rA//ZniI8tLUtby7sQVj6rT+OpG4JQr3fdLXkvSTzSxY RQjbhANVFaGQ537twuF+4xpb+vMwgBEqF61xfqHotv+ThHgXfNN+ZLYMy0yKSIksSZ9REdRxs vsHGkgLRTJxwd8jLwdbck/+5SCJPc/MTtwZMDAxHc/A34uMnQH2t7Sz6QvAqjhdSF6XKGOWD+ vJVM+vBJcKONBEY8/ve+LR/IyDi817U+MI82Kvm6Xj0SFV4YInNRSYGQO9r7hGvLQJQ8RuuFP nQVrd3U5NzNfSWj0fio6LJLYOEPYEmZ6jiDjij5sxN9/OnwIDSmpmJ6oYDjRtYekCwiE2Hj8M r4FHOw/hEpV8RsIVQrjsxEGLTgEZe3ERFT/tY9F1ZbQYzebAFgIzss3pEYLwVQnb0uQVQLzk5 5k1KTbuzKf6CU/Dk8sWTLb3TN/OjKzryfydxonsdAS+ehgraRw/K+IyxOiHJwM7a4e5UNcd2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173859 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 27.12.2019 19:57, Michael Albinus wrote: >> file-local-name uses internally file-remote-p, which calls >> expand-file-name if the connection is already established > > Why? If the caller needs an expanded name, they can call > expand-file-name themselves. Or if they need an expanded local name: > > (file-local-name (expand-file-name filename)) > > Aside from performance problems, this feels like an inconsistent behavior. I said already, that expand-file-name isn't needed for file-local-name. I will try to find a better implementation.