From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49265: [External] : bug#49265: 28.0.50; repeat mode feature request Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:48:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87bl7hccr7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87czs53aei.fsf.ref@aol.com> <87czs53aei.fsf@aol.com> <87h7hh6o8t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87wnqcv25h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874kdfekr8.fsf@gmail.com> <87lf6r6s9v.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875yxpakz6.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3947"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "49265@debbugs.gnu.org" <49265@debbugs.gnu.org>, Ergus , Juri Linkov To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 05 11:49:08 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDw-0000pZ-KR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 11:49:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDv-00066I-Ml for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35768) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDq-000667-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60777) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDq-0007IP-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDq-0001c1-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49265.16254785176166 (code B ref 49265); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 09:48:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDR-0001bO-In for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com ([209.85.221.47]:45912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0LDP-0001bB-B9 for 49265@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 05:48:36 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id i8so8432694wrp.12 for <49265@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 02:48:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=khx2kcQYaFXaieI69krWvG590i40viqMH0afoFg5Cnc=; b=epVJ1neVVTnpzB69Z0Xd3m5qei29m9DzScDZujnYCz1t2FL0sI5HgRMBrCIHjb6KwH /u/Fa1IKAHNqAWH6mlKf9m8876dpuMgvl8KuHEEt2UsgAeYr+3GNAoYDhpbtchLNG+lt cTbL0C5HJN3hGTX28WKlvG8R2RcDzsZoRpHA2f+U04HE12fujkWGmx9Fjsc6XZdac1fM i+bHQ22Epz/o+svcLUfYU2e15WN4KqtPWP2lHvp1W1DUzKNQJ1ddCXR/CqGHUgZjKDS5 7dDkn2z/yOTIDfiKmtw3lgHqfZ9Il+Rg/uJD+XYb+5YqO4Jqp+9NM2UONKWu27IrFeAc Nc9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=khx2kcQYaFXaieI69krWvG590i40viqMH0afoFg5Cnc=; b=L3b20jDZ51tqa1xMsdxcBQJeMhrMWktf+aMTjVWjQ7BKobig04sZMlP2p2UOWcZchh 4AfGihJWkZN8W+dc469K8esUkkJpfw9963IOgtjPAo+/0oy//nXbMwk55QGRymxiPxV1 4jsxqEXfRA0wvDNtulNyQuh3ERSODODIHnfmlR6YzWIzCBxk3Qz0UyxILSVS+32HIc4N GVZz0lEwLqAsO+EP/vrH2UiA6XTPq2Qb2tPq7NxlIOJqDJBdCCoeFa+kAFA9KHi54nUJ dlP9ajlhpsdHCNVDkadQ/9gxzWi54KxZxK0Q/5qN+navzQBIwdrufZG98F0Lk1bpVguE wauQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wM+abSmtqX4+6/5yMXrNJAV76U1nm5gwSHdFNsPuLG5/kUP1x QqEoyIUiduvbJodjpSONel4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzYHnBDWgdws+fPxu/xeG4/mhCSr51XPadweg/CPjn0wrLOryA8f50ZP4X7R27l9X3Guc79GA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5405:: with SMTP id g5mr14462237wrv.12.1625478509694; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 02:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n23sm11190211wmi.29.2021.07.05.02.48.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 02:48:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 4 Jul 2021 21:09:24 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209443 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sun, 4 Jul 2021 21:09:24 +0000, Drew Adams said: >> >> >> "Describe repeatable commands and keymaps." >> >> > >> >> > Again, that's wrong. "Repeatable keymaps" doesn't >> >> > mean anything (to me, anyway). If you mean describe >> >> > the keys bound to repeatable commands then say that. >> > >> > And what constitutes a keymap with repeatable commands? >> > Is a keymap with one repeatable command repeatable, even >> > if it also has bindings for commands that are not >> > repeatable? >> >> I don't see where is "Repeatable keymaps" used? >> The above docstring is >> >> "Describe repeatable commands and keymaps." >> >> i.e. "repeatable commands" and also their "keymaps". Drew> The text is ambiguous. If that's what you mean, Drew> please reword it. For example, this unambiguously Drew> applies "repeatable" only to "commands": Drew> Describe keymaps and repeatable commands. Drew> But is "describe keymaps" appropriate? Or are the Drew> keymaps that are described here only certain ones? It only describes keymaps that have bindings to repeatable commands in them. I still think we should not mention keymaps at all, only bindings. Robert --