From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:05:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87bl6y70hq.fsf@rub.de> References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 2360@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 19 18:06:27 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vml-0007Vm-Gj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:06:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vmk-0001eA-85 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5VmM-00018S-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5VmM-00080Z-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5VmM-0002Bn-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2360 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 2360-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2360.16267107378371 (code B ref 2360); Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 16:05:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vlw-0002Aw-Rj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:05:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:41659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vlu-0002AR-1A for 2360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:05:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1626710728; bh=A2OzgyUSp5Vi52pkH+6w0FmEQUJRu4MlTe8E3XFaRSg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=knYqy/k1zNLvuZ0ygm6ElDLz9U7TYAc+Ldt8nJJYBwtqG9RnFPPtxV0G/C3J4nrcj VF/ZovkR2dG6QvbMr6pIZeIlNWrGS5cwEk+HBDkUnYP8Cc5Xk+ujUhBwl8GbkFC0r5 813uzUGRabGm9/xvlWnR8WRMCyyp6pXhmNAa2qF4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobelfs ([178.1.124.244]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MZTmY-1laDWD32tq-00WVih; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:05:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dtzBS74Eld9OkcG/7aGOgEVs5ub9NzEzYmWGZJJKcDuhl/5ua0c g03Umx6hoLh/+Uj+BKJ4Kx4nwefP20CHU23g9+k8miIUWm14Qqt+ce9yyHuLe0Xi0MmIuDD i+lmsLicAujVujEPjnTx3834+KFdrvlMzk8sKqdBV37zUuZy9szyuIJvfxjHhVeCciBoYgF R40Kjr9nKeyTHoW65p09Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:IF+9eeOBCkk=:2er86vBKZLnZjTJo6y17CW BWoquBgU1nERJ0AsYbvBCoz430Bu/j2hOWlzjECNTeqVV/n+Dfr60ICeqUyLIfGV1oThworje x50ol3YJFT17+9c8kwsDxPqdDrX9cLGPqwxi0OUbaTBf330a5YxonvER2d8vjQdzZjRaptZ3Q F+eXd4/kRBv1Q3rgPmA648q3NSpZkR8vYSmuMWuQrFUDZA+adT6Sewv/7wVlBwm+nayKDbKij xuo3IDewLGAojgJNZDdtVgOpcPGagZ84c+Qyp+xyGeygY7OAC6SjyYGG8zVZHaihus9q8Dt5P ofSkDZspL01jGCoeJ1J6jO+SkrOQlNXB3wPINnq+YUF2uAfX4FN+GtegLr2ohHeywU5LNZWqp IrlqQiNDtEBWQ98bRdRUF1ZJbtTPhLOrNCiFJRJQCqD1797t6QC+fQ9zuzcyEHa3MASkgChAb 62tce3jm+2+setsLrNAPEjF4Sr/ptIPEprz/mrBxk/NZlsIu3V5wyhQSWYHgjlu0uYx+8/OPR SHkPLvaBhgi5gYB9Cw8hXEboCQatH3Zom99DE3tf2qnoqw03rd4YwNGEbWHWg5A4T0GasvoZZ 5gAUFMGlWV/+g+RQA1318YKz6RO9+vqfFBGQs/edxSuBnFav1KtFK3PXxCHX8mRlhfRzEI4Im CvUkZHxNajU5MfVRC88cV+LgTY2McdJy1K3sUKLxy80TyVziKIQOiry8dcpDdF5i1SpYAeQew Pb+HVKFeeJWx2zNh0ATN2eljShU+5Ws5b3SophL4dMltIiK8oJcXM4zOoFOQ7dGMS87xO9fT X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210282 Archived-At: On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> 1. emacs -Q -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" >> 2. Sanity check: >> a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icons and observe that the >> tooltips have their normal appearance. >> b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame has its >> normal appearance, the type `C-x 5 0'. >> c. M-: (eq (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) >> => t >> 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) >> a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the >> tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. >> b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is >> likewise translucent and barely visible. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately wasn't resolved at > the time.) > > I tried this recipe in Emacs 28 under Debian/bullseye, and I couldn't > see anything unusual. Are you still seeing this bug in recent Emacs > versions? No. At the time I had observed the problem with the x and xft font backends; I currently only have a build of emacs-26 with the xft backend and cannot reproduce the problem there either. So I assume it was fixed, or anyway stopped being a problem, long ago. Thanks for looking at the report again, and feel free to close it. Steve Berman