From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rehan Deen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54331: 27.2; Closing frames loaded from desktop-read Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 11:25:40 +0530 Message-ID: <87bkyajt0j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87h785k5ro.fsf@gmail.com> <83r179d0xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ee39j7yv.fsf@gmail.com> <83lexgd8gu.fsf@gnu.org> <875yojyrsb.fsf@gnus.org> <838rtfm3zs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.5; emacs 27.2 Cc: 54331@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 13 06:56:26 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHDN-0005eF-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 06:56:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHDM-00086G-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:56:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHD0-00085S-Hw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHD0-0000mf-8z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHD0-0008CF-6a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Rehan Deen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 05:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54331 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 54331-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54331.164715095331491 (code B ref 54331); Sun, 13 Mar 2022 05:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54331) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2022 05:55:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41444 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHCq-0008Br-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:55:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-f51.google.com ([209.85.216.51]:38905) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nTHCp-0008Ba-6y for 54331@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 00:55:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-f51.google.com with SMTP id mm23-20020a17090b359700b001bfceefd8c6so8356801pjb.3 for <54331@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 21:55:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version; bh=ZlnyvVAhCMu/iEomSR4jc616fyj7hDXmmfaniNJKOdU=; b=Cv/XsxlEQcFLpuyBV9ydXo8ua8AzQ6ToTGJuyyccZM/MkZxzEzW0AQs1N8qNRClA87 TAxniWpAfUA1QWZTU/EXR0zP5n53+Y6r9iHXgVwwn7srXZzMRsxEuQ4WX5sPJSNEJ4RW FJ5BM/r4iA2+a7n1HAWyURSURj38OcFONJnF8qcRRNz5bmL0STyx6dd6QkRoQ2w+YZ6c NkaCT5/ni0aVcyzUSPWtr48YjRdCCqQQ6N8KgzLx3CwiLy1IA727W4fkO+HLUE5l8wDZ 1JwwzDOAIA5ICIVYBiZjk71L5nTIdJx+NBLxruJFsuxV0xbBsLV5fyUnH8HER4zkwPrn JIaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=ZlnyvVAhCMu/iEomSR4jc616fyj7hDXmmfaniNJKOdU=; b=Bw8gjfhz5OXboPNicm52uhrwsedXRQbAI0kyC2YNLN/dnKIPE5UDjZfwmSenxzBvLm fCSEuc8pk8uGqkWteQ/svD3BkCBhu3nVnqSvvKgR67dJLTVOmork2swQ17unvu5meKJG imC8evnueKc/Gube21iIvHgXlMRESq7J5balVHcjUzFegqoJQ2XRmcWbfX/BaJmUL8AA QKznvghXO6ggxWOWqDPjZLZADm3A8yujAkCcDINTxxhedr9o2xmPDtoqTEqMyjeAOiY8 gyyLSlSrtGL4oTbjoJDxyead4Ric1IY3vZahhauuGZ7RoOAgHgzBtUPKMUPk+nuPZQ6P p++Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531trZSDzYpZMcXJn+wAbPn8J7ui0MpOYWMxZlWcBUrP+z5C6I2X BMIKe1dryX+jRas+/FydQ+khIa/LzIM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5eyJTc1csPZO0xL6p5r+jD5cdaunLJ18W/qgN8+H10jhnbwnEA1qwW8FesZ1u7wpb1ak9qQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b410:b0:14b:e53:7aa0 with SMTP id x16-20020a170902b41000b0014b0e537aa0mr17535868plr.101.1647150945286; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 21:55:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rd-t460 ([112.134.221.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gw19-20020a17090b0a5300b001c5c937384bsm3769337pjb.52.2022.03.12.21.55.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Mar 2022 21:55:44 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <838rtfm3zs.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228279 Archived-At: Hi, sorry, was hoping that someone else would add their input regarding the closing frame behavior but I am happy to close this. If anyone else comes across this issue, I guess I would suggest remapping `C-x 5 0` to a more convenient keybinding. Thank you for your responses to this. Best, Rehan Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: Rehan Deen , 54331@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:00:52 +0100 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Perhaps my daemon mode behavior is not standard. I am running this in >> >> i3wm on Manjaro Linux if that helps. How does one "usually" close a >> >> client frame? `C-x 5 0`, mapped to some shortcut? >> > >> > Yes, "C-x 5 0" is the way to delete just the current frame. >> >> So I guess there's nothing to fix here? > > That's my impression, but I think we should wait for Rehan to respond.