From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pierre L. Nageoire" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56596: 29.0.50; void-variable cl--nm Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:06:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87bktp6ifn.fsf@pollock-nageoire.net> References: <8735f18mxg.fsf@pollock-nageoire.net> <87cze5s44q.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21459"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56596@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 16 20:05:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oCmAA-0005Mr-Lf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:05:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58752 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCmA8-0003eG-TZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44168) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCmA3-0003e8-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oCmA2-0004Sf-St for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCmA2-0002Zs-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Pierre L. Nageoire" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56596 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56596-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56596.16579946949890 (code B ref 56596); Sat, 16 Jul 2022 18:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56596) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2022 18:04:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46010 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCm9t-0002ZS-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp05.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.127]:51826 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCm9p-0002ZG-ET for 56596@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from aboulafia ([2.14.36.239]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTP id Cm9ko6ffnHubGCm9loQte2; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:04:47 +0200 X-ME-Helo: aboulafia X-ME-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:04:47 +0200 X-ME-IP: 2.14.36.239 In-Reply-To: <87cze5s44q.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:12:21 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:237208 Archived-At: Hi, Thank you for your answer Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > "Pierre L. Nageoire" writes: > >> (hello (raw-daughter)) >> >> But only since last update from git repos. With an emacs version updated >> in march approximately no problem. > > I can reproduce this -- but only when using dynamic binding. When using > lexical binding, things work fine. This is certainly the key point ! > > I've added Stefan to the CCs; perhaps he has some comments. I suspect that cl-generic implementation has recently changed and that it should not be used nowadays exactly like it has been. Any small explanations from Stefan would be greatly appreciated ! Regards