From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49592: 28.0.50; lisp-current-defun-name and non-standard defuns Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:57:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87bksain4m.fsf@web.de> References: <878s279dfi.fsf@web.de> <87edxwezs5.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnbnigm4.fsf@web.de> <87fsiac38p.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtci1az5.fsf@web.de> <874jyp7el4.fsf@gnus.org> <87k07krehq.fsf@web.de> <87sfm6zzjj.fsf@gnus.org> <87h72mjhav.fsf@web.de> <87wnbhxwnp.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmh658th.fsf@web.de> <87a689pkm4.fsf@gnus.org> <87bksbtfug.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 49592@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 00:58:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqY-0002vg-7V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:58:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqX-0003rZ-8S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqQ-0003r6-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqP-0000DF-VF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqP-00057z-Q5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49592 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 49592-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49592.166129547519698 (code B ref 49592); Tue, 23 Aug 2022 22:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49592) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2022 22:57:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqJ-00057e-23 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:57:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([217.72.192.78]:35235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oQcqG-00057Q-Dp for 49592@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:57:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1661295466; bh=YxD6CbF7niGjACMUAIK6eeWxitz1ovicHEqe0S+LdQA=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=g32X5gIO2w0wArE3r7pdPsLy6mBrF17kqSctmH+EPVBNl7+dMK9ytn6tK3ED0ynar 4qyDQAaraR57WQ23sBV2H8MFyT+tVbGfT72UubNgQ7d12JbtOQNTn310zrJQnDrDRq AayzZM5wB6X08pSfYeixos2tzm8YL7gamSFV0xMs= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.57.248.18]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MovjQ-1pEoxY062g-00qN41; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 00:57:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bksbtfug.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2022 12:27:19 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:yTGoV3384Ry+NhCbxMcMb5FRZfjZyQ36ruL9vEsrYSmdv7R7ra1 UpKwaPTnzfIsJzhopdL7P+6I0OTzggzHnmQw63Ac+EAUKioWuXX5Zz5iXH2XDJCDGD9+UFU Gzk6upLikYh4lonUKJd6rMLIYsvvGAggrYPFJj/LcaD6yJYvGgKktRfAsKdzvbslDyVKljG IPHWImwJQyvpULn2J1MeA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:y/If+Nin5OQ=:OhTZ1NA0Ml8ewTQ3vJKz1I T/UJuBHV36gGkep0XRf84hB6dbhyILJHiXbbkf/obujrTGx0fCx3lDw3h1U5REL+o8pFnutMK 8U4VPKrUgNrgb0ibC1ujQ4OrxBZiw3MLvZK6DuCkX9ImNuz4vL5fESv2cSyEQqYSRYLg2PEvy X6nRn4OzB+iPU6w9hJRWmb9krH4Uqywg2X4qLme0WRS0rYxcK+eaKj86797QbdtEZitiXH/U1 JdjkVXHbkVjBk4lEwfSt343CsN/L67dFjEXU+ZSFhtWZlxPi6p8gTzDwKxTTy7Xxh/+yx3ey3 tBwRLy8jb0k0FMDP09YB6QXP0DsHh1v8pHMbyd0+SJzPpmWvpEdbamBRw/aK0fsq5Ip/NZCQj 0YKpGpQ4kFzaBvlhUmzQJHptHqz3+n+64gyaZWHVCVlDVI5HyLi1jBgO4hqDn4X85SPH2lV+8 PMpzhEjhmrHqW7pypVx8ksaFV3zyKJncS69iTqCAqetyCb/pJpKbzDEckQiyD+AMUobTymcp7 Xxp51fTBLxmGxl87hDoawj3GkVND9eNatEXoPuJPEkqn+K7ccyqFPKAW3WY4Pi3qaA0ekoGBA Yz2+DOzawhIN8D6J2vNfuIajiWR4FNrXZkdUPf0hcL0gXmzcwh/L/kJ+h/lI4V5lmdko4rIRP +9pJtx3KzB4K5m+AhckPGoWr5Eyvd2ErhF3O4A/tu2Fm2XyoV+9JhdSNVDa5Ibod5Ucc0P1Rq jX94WEmHi7y772sx7+aNFe5cfyLwkOmuYdMo3abaYsL5Jbd9KTBPTK+d4zUS4DfIBgsc5hE2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240578 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > 2022-08-23 Lars Ingebrigtsen > > * lisp/emacs-lisp/lisp-mode.el (lisp-current-defun-name): Revert > back to the old version before bug#49592. The new approach just > doesn't work well enough -- we don't really have the data to know > that, say, `make-obsolete-variable' is about the second symbol and > not the first. Is that because of `make-obsolete-variable's (indent defun) spec? (And is that even appropriate?) Did you see examples where the edebug spec based mechanism you added failed? Or maybe only this part: (and (eq (get symbol 'lisp-indent-function) 'defun) (get 'defun 'edebug-form-spec)) was inappropriate? Michael.