From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61496: 30.0.50; Default value of icon-title-format Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:57:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87bklwqoq6.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87zg9hqflv.fsf@telefonica.net> <83fsb8e8yr.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt5gqshv.fsf@telefonica.net> <83v8k4cp2z.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1p0tj05.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mt5gcnqb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26012"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Po Lu , 61496@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 15:58:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwlF-0006VI-Le for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:58:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwkw-00029O-2o; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:58:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwks-00025y-Az for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwks-00079m-2I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwkr-00047E-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61496 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61496-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61496.167638665315763 (code B ref 61496); Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61496) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2023 14:57:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56687 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwkO-00046B-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from relayout01-redir.e.movistar.es ([86.109.101.201]:38751) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pRwkN-00045u-6f for 61496@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:57:31 -0500 Original-Received: from sky (73.red-81-39-121.dynamicip.rima-tde.net [81.39.121.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 981711563@telefonica.net) by relayout01.e.movistar.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PGPSf4xJ0zfZHF; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:57:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83mt5gcnqb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:42:36 +0200") X-TnetOut-Country: IP: 81.39.121.73 | Country: ES X-TnetOut-Information: AntiSPAM and AntiVIRUS on relayout01 X-TnetOut-MsgID: 4PGPSf4xJ0zfZHF.A69C5 X-TnetOut-SpamCheck: no es spam, clean X-TnetOut-From: ofv@wanadoo.es X-TnetOut-Watermark: 1676991444.34936@tpK/h7j0zw/K6O3lhCcxNg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255601 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> BTW, for the record: >> >> icon-title-format stopped working after some Emacs 24.x release, and was >> only fixed in Emacs 29. >> >> I don't know if that's relevant or not. I have no opinion as to the >> arguments you or Oscar have presented, as I have not yet read them, but >> I am in favor of his change. > > I'm not opposed to the change, I just asked for minor changes in some > details of the change. The core of my proposal, is changing icon-title-format's default, so users (and external scripts!) will keep observing the same behavior after upgrading to 29. My understanding is that you opposed this change in defaults. If I'm wrong about this, my apologies. OTOH, I think that what Po just said speak volumes about the abundance and importance of icon-title-format on user's config.