On Mon, May 29 2023 22:02, Jim Porter wrote:
> A test would be great. See "test/lisp/eshell/em-prompt-tests.el": 
> another test based on 'em-prompt-test/next-previous-prompt' (and 
> possibly 'em-prompt-test/forward-backward-matching-input' too) should be 
> sufficient, I think.
>
> If you want to add a test yourself, go for it, and let me know if you 
> run into any issues. Otherwise if you prefer, I can write a test case 
> for this.

Okay, I now added some hopefully sufficient tests for this based on both
next-previous-prompt and forward-backward-matching-input (if that's not
too overkill). Let me know what you think.