bug#66567: [PATCH] use-package: Add ignored-files support to :vc keyword

[Tony Zorman via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>]

On Wed, Nov 01 2023 16:38, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
> Tony Zorman <tonyzorman@mailbox.org> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 01 2023 12:48, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>> Tony Zorman <tonyzorman@mailbox.org> writes:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 01 2023 09:09, Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why is use-package checking for valid keywords in the first place?
>>>>
>>>> Better error messages, mostly. Especially people switching from
>>>> quelpa/straight/vc-use-package might be surprised that :vc is not a
>>>> drop-in replacement for those packages. I feel like alerting them to
>>>> this fact sooner rather than later makes for a better experience.
>>>
>>> IIUC this would raise an error when an unknown keyword is encountered,
>>> right?
>>
>> Yes, a declaration like
>>
>>     (use-package foo
>>       :vc (:url "url" :blargh "123"))
>>
>> would result in the following message
>>
>>     ⛔ Error (use-package): Failed to parse package foo: use-package: Keyword :vc received unknown argument: :blargh. Supported keywords are: (:url :branch :lisp-dir :main-file :vc-backend :rev :shell-command :make :ignored-files)
>>
>> Things get a bit muddier if ':blargh' would be passed down to
>> package-vc-install.
>
> What I was wondering, was if it would make sense to raise an warning
> instead.

Now I'm a bit confused: where exactly? Inside of use-package or
package-vc? Either way, I think raising an error when the user inputs
nonsense is totally justified—I'd just like that error to be
understandable as quickly as possible.

  Tony

-- 
Tony Zorman | https://tony-zorman.com/