From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69384: 30.0.50; :align-to and bidi-paragraph-direction interaction Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:46:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87bk82gaph.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87a5no1pka.fsf@gmx.net> <86o7c4wkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <874jdw1n0w.fsf@gmx.net> <86h6hwwip1.fsf@gnu.org> <86cysjuod2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Stephen Berman Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32982"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69384@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 22:53:02 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1reiuE-0008H2-40 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:53:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reitr-0003Ff-Bz; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reitp-0003F1-BU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reitp-0006QM-3F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reiuE-0001XE-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69384 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69384-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69384.17089843585827 (code B ref 69384); Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69384) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2024 21:52:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41960 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reitp-0001Vp-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:52:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:52975) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reitm-0001VP-SF for 69384@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 16:52:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1708984323; x=1709589123; i=stephen.berman@gmx.net; bh=uGgMrvEysv+PP/YJEb/HmFub7JR1wAo5v0HOp2avcgs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=Sro6pIVX4MiAMHbzrOpIL4X+nO0QlVKL/QO+ktrN9H7iXU3lnsyCmB383ZMJDFwq BjmZ9wQjkbtHZcD8Ly70Vfepuk/ioqCGr8Smn7vvWIgCmez3PIQCrtJUOQJj6mdoZ AVXIKT6Ns9EGf2QtnAoHoYckOJ3szqINw3HFQwSOB58Xm1wGH8jIk/pJ5qpg7qxdp XTi90yLeA9N0tRP2JV6kXuu8ypg0ECdNFbIfoPH2CfBusbUYyVrqCOAyhlKEa6p4p /OOU/lWUAvd0aWPii4aEHxaJaB4M5V9SiEJLRsHmxzJMvt4cA3WqtpfWV/1RcoQer +BdA/GbPcV9FxVDqMw== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from strobelfs2 ([94.134.95.66]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MZCfD-1rRMvy2KPZ-00V625; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 22:46:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86cysjuod2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:28:09 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Jj5otE5qv7Y+hXBxtV5yf6BAxLzV98lKHxhWK8Vin/5z4G7Otg9 f/OIklJ7NLA+rBWmBjnt0jW7/rtgpyOE9PJJJVWtsFKjVoPPLZTuL8xKxhKf+Np8d5RJKvy zWFjmRDRhcID/wcZ4VQqpqa+23msqYMSzlgo338npghe8DTNCVN+YRS0KCmnMcoysON8nhr BDxky4uZe2qPgr3KfZ7ug== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:hILwJ2SadxM=;e3R8S9q8EoiJbZW3McUUNK3V5Nq YgaFTXvWo8ix7mqCTj7mB/jPt2o1F3WkLtFtpiH8JEwy5/shquj3beutA6MIXbz/3vUmsBNyi S5AonZzygjNhoTDFjmq2oCDsviI9YWllUHplkvbMOzMXJ/D/cK8D7Azz2eTsE2y+PAf6wkPCf tQnqtK97UOmxX0RNr87MZiOWa0yUnaFjxN1jvMl8qvt+kSsc2+COICnlaejzXhGHdEZa11gXq Lga3X7z4AayrdQl1a0GjuEOyakFUfmIUfBoHgAaUByZvjo6y4Ye+I58jAh3F5TkTnnlWZ591K CRACibcvkXJ91UZ/6Q1m2gGhAN0ZCMiWJjSgeNTSr+0JF0cEzs0xpaJXlqYo+5Z42ohaLpr0G wcA9Bxvb90gPakSeeW1VNCkQY5BGxMx80jtX0F8LIMuFqHGj6OxPjGSRd82mgZa2hbvsYdubA Wo1dtM/h+yvP4YDWnpeytuyR3sTf6ZunTrw5GzXWjNbdnMY5LMymMu6Gxng0Dr8IxQLKV8jHm eb/7uTcX5jRNta6lD9Kv4T+kdxlMz7SCNcz+biznNg25J2g3a/R/DzbaPxN7iYw64Gs87OqcL QN72Bjox+JnK8rY9lU03uWquV6elAh4I/EssFF1txtj+7uQ4Kt0qhzJh/qifVSuvOOYU6hTfC 8jMSt1QbHtbvgxTSZrSmIb9sNbn3Ycb4Q/2a9RxQyqw7n6fE4Mrw7ZY8htRsw+osGKez8UqFl dcU5SRBrt+HXnHOYBcwSsRJQWPST92kfH7qvuBtpM5nBqJElanO6kB47UU7XbAgkRdvJf8JE X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280708 Archived-At: On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:28:09 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 69384@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 19:35:22 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> >> > Sorry for not being clearer in my report: the bug is the broken shapi= ng >> > with the combination of setting bidi-paragraph-direction and using >> > :align-to >> >> OK, I will look into that when I have time. > > It's a relatively recent regression on the master branch, caused by > yours truly. I hope I've fixed it now. I updated and rebuilt, and confirm that with the code I posted that resulted in broken Arabic shaping, the shaping is now correct. Thanks! Steve Berman