From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#72344: [PATCH] Add a version of cl-once-only which handles lists of forms Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:01:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87bk1w55wz.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <87y15l1aj8.fsf@gmail.com> <8734nsk72i.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87plqw0y9j.fsf@gmail.com> <87ikwi5neo.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <871q35mdrd.fsf@gmail.com> <871q321l7d.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <874j7xzvgx.fsf@gmail.com> <87r0b1su7p.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <874j7o2kcq.fsf@gmail.com> <87y15012yo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11287"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 72344@debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams To: Thuna Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 14 02:02:58 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1se1Te-0002jS-8f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 02:02:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1se1TD-0005wx-Ig; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1se1TA-0005we-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:29 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1se1TA-0004hJ-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=g/sGj9S23ZuioV0H4Qd+NpL4IoJ1LXVgLwN6s/yT/9Q=; b=m5iGnahF96MD0vt0vQn++Pd4vPG+k7DIPiTHNxrmUU+pULDwDrRBO+5O1R77xdn92uKCAgndAd9JbvALBXz668PoaQ3CA+xxQ6d/jAsMPVtZbC330RDsUbNVn1aeuiZDhrrEuO8f71VKECZCo3iGLFX5CHA01ueFgnfdJ8ryYflS99NPTDlR9TUWMfMsypwXH1lkAFuoz+iy7LOVAcJaqTT1QJCfH2kxh+S1D9sIvslA790GDXXgeTWM6dhE9XVJGEDVh613musOdgipqjSg0mPeOEHNvsuC2oB1upLCsyKPBwoyzKjVm3Yuv6TZT37538BwUylpevbny5zMhnU38A==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1se1Th-0006he-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Sean Whitton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 72344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 72344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B72344.172359372625642 (code B ref 72344); Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 72344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Aug 2024 00:02:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1se1Sn-0006fW-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]:46062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1se1Sl-0006eq-8r for 72344@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:02:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=Id0v7La/I9W7G+JTSUlSuZj2WhgDG5LZwcCsDuEmplOS8hPW7o6PBAjyEnUtxHFIh8HJr3Ai29FhvVkqdNl9iYqvB29P1AbkHtgqnjxccywtd5rQtwTpzdFgeyekkkmtMLuJC/Gus+Q7kfPBLU7c/qa9+xBzHN6+Qb3/jHdwbQzoqxYcoMb+v5rn4X6/2HLRZ2C+rpjdyEqA/wVUKK+BC8N+ltTBvIk9xjRqTXJh7baJNMebWlfkh2nD9kiZin1x+mAeSKyVEfv30N9g3nTKzMPXew3feZzhTqp3bf02p3n4lyPt6/alYxPJAusfnqOg3ctxn+DtBJlDCMDBJ7sfcw==; s=purelymail1; d=spwhitton.name; v=1; bh=S0/9ORI4i22UV1L5jfI+zK1Cfg0y0yaZzPYz8t30aD0=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=TxOzcDL7R0z4vM136VZpDZrnWK+4v3nLAZ7qOsriUFERCxBRZQ1+SYyuFDwP1/7WlcBKlEz/BMGphlkkCJx2BKftrRE8q08TuApFG1JZ6rBLntASv7C2B30Zhqf1jT0SyHMmzpnXuIBmf+WHBUDn+ss9aDEHkvtl/mbfoEbynAaNMK4bFSPrmR7vPyXKzmXb4OV2wNyx0CXeTQV10m1tbZvSRvCd06Mmp5fDZlInS32iAtTxnIoXHpT78gjjWe6Td2FOWFszx8aAIv/lSfevTioEA8XvvYbGdLt+6D+ylhkwwVS1Sb4LwGnSm8m4pjKdU2T4+tHNq1VoNqB+WETNTw==; s=purelymail1; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=S0/9ORI4i22UV1L5jfI+zK1Cfg0y0yaZzPYz8t30aD0=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: 72344@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -734656803; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E8FB7EC82B; Wed, 14 Aug 2024 08:01:16 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <87y15012yo.fsf@gmail.com> (Thuna's message of "Wed, 14 Aug 2024 00:18:39 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:290098 Archived-At: Hello, On Wed 14 Aug 2024 at 12:18am +02, Thuna wrote: >>> If Drew wants to start a new conversation to move `cl-once-only' (and >>> also this) out of cl-lib we can also just go with any name now and then >>> finalize it afterwards, though of all the names the one I favor is still >>> `cl-once-only-multiple' above all others (sans `cl-once-only*' which is >>> not an option - unless if you changed your mind about it?). >> >> I've said all I have to say on the matter. I seem to be a minority of >> one, and won't bother starting any new thread about it. > > I don't know what the overall opinion is, but I do not necessarily > disagree with you that cl-lib should be for (and only for) emulating > Common Lisp. While I do not know the scope and extent of the changes > you want to make, I support moving with-gensyms and once-only (and > consequently this) out of cl-lib. However I simply do not have the > energy to start (more) arguments and try to convince people to make this > change. They were quite deliberately put under cl-, actually, when I added them. -- Sean Whitton