From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#117: bug 117: messed up frame parameters Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:00:49 -0500 Message-ID: <87abag7jy6.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87r63thynq.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <002a01c968c2$9d6b7860$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230456222 3956 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2008 09:23:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 28 10:24:50 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LGrt9-0006hK-Dr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 10:24:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LGrrv-00034e-Nn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LGrrr-00031E-Gu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LGrro-0002vq-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38473 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LGrro-0002vl-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:24 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:57032) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LGrrn-0000eM-Mn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBS9NLYY025339; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:23:21 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBS9A5pU021910; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:10:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 117 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 117-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B117.123045484219773 (code B ref 117); Sun, 28 Dec 2008 09:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 117) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 28 Dec 2008 09:00:42 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBS90dwP019767 for <117@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:00:40 -0800 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1076157E217; Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:00:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <002a01c968c2$9d6b7860$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Sun, 28 Dec 2008 00:02:21 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:23:26 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23533 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> I can't reproduce this using the recipe you gave. > > Did you try on MS Windows? > The recipe and code I sent reproduces the problem, for me. > >> Please try to reduce the size of the test case. One way to do this is >> to define a function like this: >> .. >> and sprinkle (check-frame-parameters) throughout your code. Then turn >> on debug-on-error, and see when the error first appears. > > Please see the test case I sent. I don't have MS Windows available. The purpose of my suggestion is to find a way to reduce the size of your test case, which makes it easier for someone who does have MS Windows available to do the debugging. So, please try doing that.