From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5364: 23.1.91; execute-extended-command should do like FFAP Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:00:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87aawilq6x.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263349185 4333 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2010 02:19:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5364@debbugs.gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 13 03:19:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUspZ-00053J-Fx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:19:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUspa-0004BO-5J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUspJ-00046v-RN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUspF-00046O-9O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33545 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUspF-00046L-2S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42002) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUspE-0000hn-RW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUsXe-000845-4D; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5364 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5364.126334801830870 (code B ref 5364); Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2010 02:00:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUsWv-00081q-Bn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.177] helo=homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NUsWr-00081B-Bl for 5364@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-5.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by homiemail-a14.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 984EF8C06A; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:00:08 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:01:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34249 Archived-At: Stefan: Yes but adding our way doesn't hinder your way, It merely adds a tip which you can ignore. But telling us to use your way, SM> M-b C-M-SPC M-w followed by M-x C-y RET is just continuing the stone age punishment for no reason. And if we never ran into the need over and over, we wouldn't have reported it. So there.