From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7501: Minor doc & comment typos in vc-dir-query-replace-regexp Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:01:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87aakljamw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <19697.34911.639680.747289@rgr.rgrjr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291511742 12803 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2010 01:15:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7501@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bob Rogers Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 05 02:15:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3CT-00055V-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:15:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50584 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3CS-0007hc-Sg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38990 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3CD-0007bI-Cz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3CB-000454-98 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:21 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33347) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3CB-00044y-7G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2tW-0005ca-ID; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7501 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7501-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7501.129151054421570 (code B ref 7501); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2010 00:55:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2tE-0005br-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2tC-0005bg-FS for 7501@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:55:42 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014248.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB511SNn011586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:01:28 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD87916059F; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 20:01:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <19697.34911.639680.747289@rgr.rgrjr.com> (Bob Rogers's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2010 17:38:23 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:56:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42166 Archived-At: Bob Rogers writes: > The second doc line was duplicated, and the wrong function name was > cited in the comment (there is no `dired-do-replace-regexp'). Thanks, committed.