From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7865: Bug in display-buffer-reuse-frames [was Re: bug#7865: 24.0.50; doc of display-buffer-reuse-frames] Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:10:20 -0500 Message-ID: <87aai1x8lf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <7505A1C76F6C42E4A27159D548366974@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297546605 4331 80.91.229.12 (12 Feb 2011 21:36:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 12 22:36:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoN8s-0003kc-0T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:36:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoN8r-0004iS-DO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:36:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45838 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PoN8k-0004fs-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:36:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoN8i-0004ix-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:36:26 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PoN8i-0004it-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:36:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoMbS-0002Vf-2x; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7865.12975444929601 (code B ref 7865); Sat, 12 Feb 2011 21:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2011 21:01:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoMax-0002Un-Nu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PoMav-0002Uc-Ir for 7865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1CLALPW006216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:10:22 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 30B9F1605B7; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:10:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <7505A1C76F6C42E4A27159D548366974@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:47:45 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:02:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44079 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > This option is used in only `display-buffer', in a test that is > essentially (or pop-up-frames display-buffer-reuse-frames ...) > > That means that this option has no effect if `pop-up-frames' is > non-nil. I think this is actually a bug. Doing `C-x b' with non-nil display-buffer-reuse-frames should make Emacs raise another frame if it;s already displaying the desired buffer---regardless of the value of pop-up-frames. Currently, if display-buffer-reuse-frames and pop-up-frames are both t, `C-x b' instead displays the buffer in the existing frame. So `pop-up-frames' has changed the behavior, even though it's not doing any "popping up" in this case.