From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16211: eww should support multiple *eww* buffers Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:05:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9fqy8q9.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87fvpmwint.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87eh56dkdo.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87d2knaf08.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387872732 3799 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 08:12:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16211@debbugs.gnu.org, Ivan Shmakov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 09:12:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN6A-0002Es-3f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:12:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN69-0006oV-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:12:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN60-0006oN-HW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:12:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5u-0000bG-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5u-0000bC-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:12:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5t-0002bv-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:12:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16211 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16211-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16211.138787270910013 (code B ref 16211); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16211) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 08:11:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37610 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5g-0002bQ-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:11:49 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:47672) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5c-0002bG-Uq for 16211@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 03:11:47 -0500 Original-Received: from 77.18.245.69.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.245.69] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VvN5M-00084z-PP; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:11:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d2knaf08.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:11:35 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1VvN5M-00084z-PP MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1388477490.84974@HCf6l3MQ/45FlS3inQ1aXA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82501 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I was talking about "tabs" and "windows" specifically, which imply a > collection of eww buffers should be somehow associated. Anyhow, as I > said, I'm in favor of this as well, I just didn't want to assume this > direction was desirable. I'm not sure I quite see the value in grouping eww buffers in tabs, but it should be possible to just rename an eww buffer and create new ones with `M-x eww'. That's almost possible now, perhaps? The eww buffer uses only buffer-local variables (or is supposed to), so things should, like work. But I haven't tried doing that at all, so the likelihood of that working is probably zero. >"? But it should be fixable. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/