From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28842: gnus-sync is missing Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:15:26 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87a7yn7tqp.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87374jd66s.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bmj6dda0.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87vahe911g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87374id7jy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <877ett8g7k.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513098979 10177 195.159.176.226 (12 Dec 2017 17:16:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:16:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28842@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 12 18:16:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOoA8-0002Ob-UL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 18:16:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59633 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOoAG-0004TY-46 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOoA3-0004Rw-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOo9y-0005xq-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOo9y-0005xh-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOo9x-00059k-VU; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28842-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28842.151309893819781 (code B ref 28842); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 17:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28842) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2017 17:15:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOo9a-00058y-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:15:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:45008) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOo9Y-00058j-ST for 28842@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:15:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id m59so49037482qte.11 for <28842@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:15:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=o1bFRI8bKpQHqDv7bVxI6SHKIkITvw/Zd8RmH+mKAZc=; b=nrqtGryMNc7I0E9Wxw1BKegCzQDcK/DElZZg7kBEXqja67e2qQpUaI0Qvwom4IE4tu uM2PvN7dUUFZpwxomCWDQ92nwlOfx53XdVhw7aALyEtgzA85VpyTukCzATA8WA46a5mO LPhpfaZYoweRmXkEwyiciXMzKzcZ7O38dg8ho= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=o1bFRI8bKpQHqDv7bVxI6SHKIkITvw/Zd8RmH+mKAZc=; b=ML1XkRM4c0hQee0qDuGxfWoyArDTxtdJ9KUpzdnmC0jtPYzotoDxleaMKw6w0L7NLB BabtUizpl7rkotRvjKbTAAFJUeJG/Qx/dl2p6Q3s/Yv5Jf4D56eXa22PbS8Xrp59QNQ7 E5NCtEwx2X/l4s1la+3rs+ytJrjXrLicXfgbm9HYo76GvVLymT3yrYKnZFV8YvkkDYpL I0NbHnW1XpL2TQBCKy1WuTGxb66PTrRCacmXb+NfIEWfkdzNP8Q5vFm1wIJ0VD7q6IdC z2KdyyIAdPnt+VEHqMcmjWzqkfCWLHEF1LN6alJyJ+bNrRSQ27dWaN1JDJJDgcp3btPU 4I/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLW2pG8XtXUOnrnpChpISlAlJwJFUQqSyjRKtmmwNcOo4VPikx8 6GKu32LrX3UJ3n5EGtOuXPCpltmYQRY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov9HoGXLLIiv/G5Xk0rgCHahDOo+ajK74JANOVVpknFi5Kldu+ra3z/XLdXR8H6mYT6pgwt1w== X-Received: by 10.237.34.151 with SMTP id p23mr6323962qtc.194.1513098930883; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:15:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-76-28-41-155.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [76.28.41.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2sm5855238qkf.20.2017.12.12.09.15.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:15:29 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:37:53 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140984 Archived-At: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:37:53 -0500 Richard Stallman wrote: RS> The name "gnus-cloud" has a problem -- it uses the word "cloud" RS> which is a buzzword that spreads confusion. Using that term is harmful. RS> (See https://gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#CloudComputing.) RS> What does this facility do? Surely we can find a coherent and RS> non-confusing name for it. We had that discussion in emacs-devel. I don't think it belongs in this bug report. Thanks Ted