From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25030: 25.1; Unexpected indentation and syntax-highlighting in `emacs-lisp-mode' Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87a7v3trww.fsf@gmail.com> References: <868taptb26.fsf@gmail.com> <87efkftyez.fsf@gmail.com> <86in9rmw6h.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1521511988 32366 195.159.176.226 (20 Mar 2018 02:13:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:13:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: Andy Moreton , 25030@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 20 03:13:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6lr-0008IH-Vo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 03:13:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6nu-0005DF-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37088) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6np-0005D6-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6nl-0002zV-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6nl-0002z9-Rz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:15:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6nl-00008F-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:15:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 25030-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25030.1521512056432 (code B ref 25030); Tue, 20 Mar 2018 02:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Mar 2018 02:14:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6n2-00006t-IJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:39591) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ey6n1-00006i-Dk for 25030@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 22:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v13so408355iob.6 for <25030@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:14:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=sX8Kj12739QndPEbPfD77R9PNUM1Y+zVJ0i6m1XqrNk=; b=HsWSVJTTdDfp8AOWL8qLW42xr0r/N1jV039D9Mg9SWlVxOKGPP8+eqKeyPaIoDBpFy FzwBUel5QGX2xAvJxS+12EjMy2zYaovcah1nvd3MOvEA5YvXHPLVJfznwZZFqN+zfMVi BCCMm5/+eY65cwAiukYwJ3NpwG0hZ77syLZ+1xs/1BB26plRO00hMuvas5AC5LMzrj9Q ly6CYGJ+BATFEt5OUPT5dOLL0r1uYlpGqdZnZqMsppB2GibID/KIM5ellHGE57HEpXkC 3Jn6japnIOPWxN9fzLyqs3oC3Wf+YruT/ZIk0OD0qvNBcZ94teJVztubledpx7c9l1GI zytQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=sX8Kj12739QndPEbPfD77R9PNUM1Y+zVJ0i6m1XqrNk=; b=iKYhyx1eF8+u3G3bHXKswLOMZXvLf5qJIaH011Ze4jjV6abfoKhWQQ0v7YNavgbq9l m/GVlnsnKGki6GNiLN/SzMhMPHHuiI7kRagP5DIMG3wSVswyIXEvSzakcT8yKjqETuyY oqhZD7qjeYbGaF8ZHA0yzB4ChffH+m+cNYPBS05RUqFZXIo6PDHdXTjJIiIkG7BO0bni 4UOizHfh69mvVIp42C0TvKQNy0qHsPPEdkCiTb8UydbXoKjxUfLvNPM5FfKUEp+G0bpV spPcW98HML9iBfy3ccO6cGWMSrkU8fSjzPJXB1obsNRSyWc6bJGEg6ihMFPNvxcBjcKg bYMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EHDFqKjTM/heX+mTZMjGYjJ+4Vuo2K/b5jpLfhkdRIPqu3SdEu k5sZ/PxTKSGK0xr9qHNkQRMGHw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELu8V7QBMp/IaF9pj6MIDFoZtluMNBBH+kaFYXXgcn6NnMGMp3howDtkL3bEnp0jysl7b57EtA== X-Received: by 10.107.20.13 with SMTP id 13mr14414742iou.246.1521512049811; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d18sm307573iob.77.2018.03.19.19.14.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Mar 2018 19:14:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 19 Mar 2018 18:35:43 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:144437 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> I disagree. The interpreter and byte compiler do not care about the >> indentation style that you choose for your code: the syntax and >> semantics are unaffected. >> >> Style choices should not produce warnings. An indication that code layout >> is following an unusual style may be useful, but it should be optional, and >> it should not use the warning face (it should have a separate face that can >> be customised independently of the warning face). > > What Andy said. This has nothing to do with byte-compiling > (or interpreting, for that matter). I don't understand why you guys are all of a sudden talking about byte-compiling. > It should be easy for users to give the face(s) used for > stylistic highlighting different appearance(s) from standard > Emacs faces that have other meanings. Anyway, if this just about reorganizing the faces used, I have no objections.