From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35873: Add atomic window support to Gnus Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 06:42:20 +0800 Message-ID: <87a7b3eucz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87h89kuch2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imsxy3lj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a7b4q7ed.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="256338"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35873@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 17 00:43:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9ziA-0014Pn-TH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Sep 2019 00:43:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zi9-0002s9-9K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zi3-0002s1-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:43:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zi2-0004pY-Ej for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zi2-0004pQ-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zi2-0001sH-AR; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35873 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35873-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35873.15686737567171 (code B ref 35873); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35873) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2019 22:42:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zhb-0001rb-S1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:34456 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i9zha-0001rM-8M for 35873@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 18:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (unknown [36.102.228.103]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D353BFA028; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 22:42:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87a7b4q7ed.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2019 23:05:14 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166599 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> I do want to pursue the other avenue a bit, but if that doesn't work out >> or looks like too much effort, I'll push this. > > That was twelve weeks ago -- has there been any further progress here, > or should this bug report be closed? The "other avenue" hasn't gone anywhere, at least not for now, so I would still like to push this. It's fairly self-contained, and seems to do the right thing. I'm getting on a plane in a bit, but when I've settled a bit I'll look at the patch again and push. Eric