From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33005: 27.0.50; Data loss with Gnus registry Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:23:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87a79xg8no.fsf@web.de> References: <871s8yvsrq.fsf@web.de> <87in29x33z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2gxygox.fsf@web.de> <87efcxwzr2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ldtlcks.fsf@web.de> <87ftxdl7w1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878t33cjf2.fsf@web.de> <87o8za4gbl.fsf@web.de> <87mueuicys.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d0fgnik0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87v9srzm9g.fsf@web.de> <87ftjvz045.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv8ajd6d.fsf@web.de> <87lftlsr90.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87h849xds3.fsf@web.de> <87eezcpuac.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lftjkcj7.fsf@web.de> <87sgnr74ig.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sgnq5s3l.fsf@web.de> <87mudy5cxj.fsf@web.de> <87lfth6fbv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="249319"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33005@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 18 21:24:45 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXre-0012cS-TS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:24:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXrc-0001h2-Sv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXr1-0001gk-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXr0-0002it-Bm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXr0-0002i8-4F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXqz-0007OE-U1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33005.157142661728364 (code B ref 33005); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2019 19:23:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51582 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXqb-0007NP-BZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:23:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:56199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iLXqY-0007N6-9u for 33005@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 15:23:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571426597; bh=+uV7KtxIM7KOLJugE99nbTOWzVof0uKcQ92CZBrD09k=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=qO0m7NvREjOphmLf5Vzr0px+XEDvreg+xUQsaybjRkkQuKETmrliV93eURkbfiplV EXUD05WuwnaXQuLoX4g618AIYML+SwE0FPCbrQudfGlIX/2saFl34Ml23525CQ/yM1 i1pDSNVJtAJM0QUxIcEV1LSog5/uV/dE6iSccAhw= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTxth-1iUin628kj-00Qh3d; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 21:23:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfth6fbv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:09:24 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/0z64sCqFyBlOgZ703dlQiGsw5cyw5YhmVCAbm/tlGepx6uKz2U cgT2I0LaHlVkrLUZ31K0CiVBVqb2y5U0f7QFQWUbqHTgRzlnosg2gvjS29qvYH2iTbTv55n ZgOZCSXpjW8gSn+lHPtunEJURSlxDivQevKHEyU2p5HWluEk0EUBqMsYvEddML5jjie0zeZ qrNVe+LERrsJN5MuLcHbw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:QA1Vkq+f/2k=:d4L23CfE7APGWpGdc9HLv0 tgVQKghXP3emFmT6bkda5WrS9uYrrBmxjekIQULQxFjT/nqq0pk18xHzJ/Ms263uHclBz6cd7 7jUOQQ4LjR42TUjIAXIryqJc68mBHgH+SDBHXt2lBHa8t0JTg/O6ga+1Hd3PqXfEGnwjrdKUb T2sU2AeAsVPPkWJWqzgM+Z+n+lqTgmLSA/Ai5ZxQAbpaIKPnKO4G7929qCJF62nnUGjh2ND29 ePNy6VygvE8Vrh2JhZ3UVhMDXZi4bLfWo9KbiccxjY5RU+4mgiMPsq0cK1RjM1SMfWhOjToPX LnJOQqkZ8FDh8sAUtK7KhNO7Zpf+N8YGVxlcVUX4oCp9P37v6f5mYoZJcGlQ6rB8N1jwflH9t 4rkLN6RiRsroIfQtVbbN4ZOvDa4N9EeZOPhG/vCHGCbETxU/duEiak4s6bFYIJF8800LWNm0f 9UMQfLEkkX2e8hZRY9Iwwi7mHnxR5ON10eYWtuXT2ivBHdLETAMMt7olSICMHfWmgm43vpG5r 26MXP7xZURdNeMv0BXspYEvboqkFVDHMJdgL1Tm9ixiv2xZ9R1an7UiAy37KvzFl+BO3KrtdU n+1YjQz+iN86xaD22t8YINsDLzHAwYcB/3uJJIK880DrNE0qdpubXwiNC7O+vqxqcnxEN4lPX FIZ0HSTuCAX0wxb42uwerlwf3c62os3DqmOUh/JQ6uDtStt1vmgULSHGXYc8a/yX+/HLngALw ztAYhGH84nNdOsaJKLCBVef8ZviE9P7nOmybQ3qE49dUDelgPr2LPQ0zGgMPODa04HV22XQA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169678 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > btw, could you please consider to install something like > > Wait, just to be sure I understand what's happening here: does the > default option value get evaluated at compile time, or load time, At load time. > and is there a difference? I think that only difference to before is that you get a useful behavior (works as expected) when you open the file and load the buffer (tested). I didn't think long about it but instead I had a look how other packages handle the case. Michael.