From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39115: 26.3; eww consecutive links look like one link with mouse-over Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:22:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87a76es6pu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <86imlfxu7t.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgk7ttca.fsf@gnus.org> <837e1jv4fa.fsf@gnu.org> <8736c7qp4x.fsf@gmx.net> <83r1zrthvn.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2tzp6g4.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="98640"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 39115@debbugs.gnu.org, ynyaaa@gmail.com To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 23 16:01:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iudzS-000Pcb-0w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 16:01:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iudzQ-0001H7-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVn-00060i-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:23:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVm-0002Qo-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45936) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVm-0002Qi-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:23:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVm-0005UI-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:23:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39115.157978215221041 (code B ref 39115); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2020 12:22:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51909 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVI-0005TJ-5q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:22:32 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:48082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubVG-0005T6-Ky for 39115@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:22:30 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iubV8-0004Qv-3p; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:22:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y2tzp6g4.fsf@gmx.net> (Stephen Berman's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:44:11 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175151 Archived-At: Stephen Berman writes: > Why do overlays and text properties differ on this? Overlays are objects, so even if they have identical properties, it's easy to see where an overlay starts and stops. For text properties, we just use ad-hoc strategies like seeing whether the property we're interested changes or not, and determine the start/stop of the region based on that. It's perhaps unfortunate that text property regions don't have more "identity", but I guess it'd be difficult to change that now. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no