From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34765: 26.1; with-temp-buffer should not run buffer-list-update-hook Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:03:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87a6uzan9s.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <5C7FD591.9090505@gmx.at> <83lg1sc8ob.fsf@gnu.org> <5C8009F3.5000405@gmx.at> <767e1b59-6ac2-cd11-076e-82a56ac53e29@gmx.at> <11be4631-b087-52a3-92fe-4cbd5248908d@gmx.at> <838svxxk41.fsf@gnu.org> <49c11920-0909-dcc2-4a39-4cdcfaf20453@gmx.at> <87h7sp1xay.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1rgpusx.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn5u7m0y.fsf@gnus.org> <5bdc73dd-af73-1b9a-9bb4-e154787e1976@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33395"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34765@debbugs.gnu.org, alexanderm@web.de, Lars Ingebrigtsen , monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 29 22:05:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTsl-0008Z9-2v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:05:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTsk-0005j3-5F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrX-0004rv-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41218) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrX-00011k-5L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrX-0000Lb-0p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:04:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34765 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34765-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34765.16066838331291 (code B ref 34765); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 21:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34765) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2020 21:03:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52760 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrM-0000Kl-Ou for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com ([209.85.128.45]:38781) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kjTrL-0000KW-0e for 34765@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 16:03:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id g185so11056927wmf.3 for <34765@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:03:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=Tn14tOjQZZj/ie+KlAaL5BEVpgqr0zIhbQ+r8sgZhsc=; b=Cf9i4Ck53lseW1oN8LHhuK+B7NZFYTExAkV1/SebVE9O9Dm5tisnse5husWhgcLl0m 0QlFyiQ7K7HWYj7jg+AlAa9VOksaOO3na1L6fJzgVf5nSUOx5PACceGhfeYcj+JNHv3z c1SzecwwgPOvOEPuFC17H5Wm5DazKYWNrm87fzXySQngov2OebnSaH+xziL6XuByPyie 2XisL0kxGhJBuwq007Kb/6enNAWhoP3iAMNAtMK6I0K7iZMbLyvnhYgBncraM+ikcMIJ BWrfuCoJivwyd/ynRU/Ghb6W+uVgBAfvGOFCR4N7jUQpUePA6zKOjKn01xvUk3m/NK0H S+Aw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=Tn14tOjQZZj/ie+KlAaL5BEVpgqr0zIhbQ+r8sgZhsc=; b=hgM9zJrhUoan5T7V44jHcnyM2hb1idOn6SWQzJPmODoyt1VmiIS+zdKaQwwnWykIbe +O9SXdxI+vdl07Qem0O8QDa3gHhz115QGxoQipprSdNgAZlBcyGSU/Y0rnngN9YmO3iz vhvZL5xFD5bM2usupdVeLjGy8qvWc1uSBwT5gzVXLOcad9t7BUBCTxef5cped5WvGOFw VgwXMskDvjnEVHC9ARj76hmz2q+cy7OcMXb6GDcXtlEZkPF7qw5+VmMiYG2yroECVQdx xH6sHVY/WUkefJF3OMD2oG+URteNaYhanbOuN3DkTg62JVvv4tbyqUSiZ+pQ27qbewtm Gl0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Zn/4U/YS3zH43WUNzx4igpy5QyYyDzNLciJmdtBQra2bzSF/Y s0pXr7aJ5Gx6nUgWZyav3KbS5g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgHEueggB7vd5qFCJPrKOF5143GK4Ty3zUXz/cFG5f87Ps+iLgkLVfi1/EaOFH1VFskbwMUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2d47:: with SMTP id t68mr20260697wmt.148.1606683825031; Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:03:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:92bd:1bfd:38fc:fae2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm24079633wrv.77.2020.11.29.13.03.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:03:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5bdc73dd-af73-1b9a-9bb4-e154787e1976@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 7 Oct 2020 09:58:55 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194584 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >>>> The latter may be a nice addition, but the patch here is pretty much >>>> necessary for implementing something like that, so was there any reason >>>> the patch wasn't applied? >>> >>> AFAIU, the patch was never finalized after the review comments. >> >> Right. Martin, did you finish up this patch? > > No. IIRC some issues were never resolved and Basil also wanted to add > something. Did I? AFAICT I was only pointing out the trivial simplification of Fgenerate_new_buffer_name + Fget_buffer_create = Fgenerate_new_buffer once Fgenerate_new_buffer can be called from C. I was otherwise happy with the patch and either of the proposed approaches to setting inhibit_buffer_hooks. > If you can make heads or tails of it ... Depends: is it an animal or a coin? -- Basil