From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49261: 28.0.50; File Locking Breaks Presumptuous Toolchains Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6mrd2di.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87o8bn7bie.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgv6vuon.fsf@gmx.de> <837di9lwbm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6n5vuu4.fsf@gnus.org> <8735sqnmei.fsf@gnus.org> <87zguyf4ht.fsf@gmx.de> <87pmvum54p.fsf@gnus.org> <87v95mf2lj.fsf@gmx.de> <87pmvt3ob1.fsf@gnus.org> <87fswpgacv.fsf@gmx.de> <87bl7dfikj.fsf@gmx.de> <8735sofuqj.fsf@gmx.de> <83sg0oc83l.fsf@gnu.org> <87v95jevrm.fsf@gmx.de> <83lf6fdav4.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1g7eoor.fsf@gmx.de> <87im1jphyy.fsf@gnus.org> <87im1fd4fr.fsf@gmx.de> <83sg0jaaud.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27145"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, ncaprisunfan@gmail.com, 49261@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 12 16:38:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4T-0006lx-61 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39690 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4S-0004c8-6r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4M-0004bs-32 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4L-0005NY-Ri for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4L-0004yR-Lu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49261 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 49261-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49261.162610067619108 (code B ref 49261); Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49261) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2021 14:37:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4G-0004y7-Ii for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:34769) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m2x4E-0004xu-GQ for 49261@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 10:37:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1626100668; bh=I3cQfLsDUKelMp6MNceqDGegZBV7rmGPCMVLGo4LNkw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FEQT73C74FlrsJVvwnQUfXgGeKvdEnkmvrnZ1o7UHGGch2Mye4z17o2XgAr84yovZ iIjqVK6CLWQGdIxPw4v8B7zFXVo89P43Kipa5Q86syWRIk0mgKYmfFgZy/WgZVfMX8 c+qq+uCR8lzvJ2L3aaFPGmPfB49Qjtg0jfaMGQXQ= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.146.224]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9Mta-1l6kGN2EeS-015Jsp; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:37:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83sg0jaaud.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:03:06 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:as5RFJ1W3LNJdkcJo0goVSvI0cSy8e/pETNLdoIhjEczNyRc86x 1Ry7uRmji7CubvoAQoJooDUhILrB1IJ5JVOrYaka9jxYfiDiKTHOLoWFGmg8xemlaXFlfy2 9JElK7C7dHRvnrpmEMdxYL+CZ2+jtOXzKydxhu58eUb1gXvU6bWr6FJuTdY1qbFNWt3/BQd yD0yU007Cee976WtaGtRg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Nkq/Q/g/Txc=:ovEfTYXhRaK11hq0UXvbQM ksVHh+n9wfNOCUJ2IlsHbvVsKVrQxqH3hEvtj/k+8FSdQmVzoq7aRSuqvqvpV9dMRQPKFmiX8 sHNAEZ8J2trRtLBwIgdlwHStKVMyZkMinZNHu4O1WLjvPGMSvhO1H4Wu9IefNjzK8cOQzhTna ed072IVTwsCzdnjjKVFMoePWgNlwiZwkeXu7AIe02z+NASG1V0mfVk/eNwuC2Y3AVta9IrFUK NQ8mCnStNDwM9HEaNsY1sRw4jXVpohqgZJiLjB8bmdahpT8iReEZDk3MTkFA99LocmXSA6gLa yokayBCYO3rJioDLJdSDRflbjSq304oEOJf3oYdwAGGpgTSf7UxsUbo7n4He8TwF+5PDGLbIT YV6uil238/nuJSod68zYLgddHCa6IkdKkIA48CeTS7wdgGGHSnkmeYNd8TjwWRdUysymM/asj LvZQFkJiIQ9r4uFZ4Y38gSLw42zd1NHB+8qsCMrMQdM/gHSKc0uNfuN5KR/x5RB9m13XwI2w1 m7iHdLc3+BR50poZ7akLE/pCmiKBXLMFjJBnJd8XXm6ElA+tVUGNtX5iZZODLJPpDiNuW81wM +t91o8mWd3mdiXSmIHgukOB/fnEfWGliY1anxVu2YVLikpSM41s1afHVvRLurQLTKuYfI8ewe 7LKy9xj6oMPV2aZ2xniRBd3bcGjkKRQH47tE1gYeLF7eqKpYHRo7mN2lGM0YvBQswAp2D9cgs ZxS5NKP4DJvpyru3J6Sz3nU3TS2icRjuBKUVlq5OlL8bZ+6AHGoYuFuztTEmCxeS4YYqszgR X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209823 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi Eli, >> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> >> >> Until now, there are no file locks for remote files at all. I though= t >> >> disabling it for remote files would be requested by some users for >> >> backward compatibility. >> > >> > Yeah, I think it's a good idea, and allowing REPLACEMENT to be nil se= ems >> > like the natural way to implement it. >> >> And now? You and Eli disagree in this point, and I don't know what to d= o. > > Which disagreement between us leaves you at an impasse? If there is > indeed such a disagreement, maybe we could find a compromise which > will allow some way forward. Lars agrees my proposal to use lock-file-name-transforms for disabling file locks. You did argue against. Best regards, Michael.