From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57364: 28.1.91; asynchronous X server error when creating a second frame on alternate DISPLAY Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:32:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87a66k2052.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tu624d64.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmgnu812.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jxzu2et.fsf@yahoo.com> <87tu5zsgns.fsf@yahoo.com> <875yiescwd.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jxur0iu.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h71up62o.fsf@yahoo.com> <878rn6oxhs.fsf@yahoo.com> <87v8p92d9z.fsf_-_@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15960"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Po Lu , 57364@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?ram=C3=ADrez?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 19:51:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odEjf-0003xE-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:51:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odEje-0005dd-Pm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odET4-00086s-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odET3-0001xf-SD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odET3-0007vi-Md for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57364 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57364-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57364.166429998830421 (code B ref 57364); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57364) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2022 17:33:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56703 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odESC-0007ub-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54924) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odES9-0007tc-Nj for 57364@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:33:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=gDtbHZDxJP6kt6nVsqr84d0aMhxEmHcZk7n8UOqbUA4=; b=Txn2b9QtUhPw/WvywO9Eae5brz vJ4VaHzlqxu7AuSsWKhVli6ErUQN5UuI579dfrvWlBRi0prE+Z0nClNRDktfhEY8S1YiCnDiAl5QI 1O17uGMq71zxkNm4LYJDFX08TelU3Ipjy4Z+hzrr+37FfvrkQKoU1wHogcIJDAorUNFI=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odES1-00041p-KD; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:32:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?ram=C3=ADrez?="'s message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2022 13:46:30 +0000") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXSPojkR5WfMmxV Gz////9Th9zBAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAlwSFlzAAAPYQAAD2EBqD+naQAAAAd0SU1FB+YJGxAu KdNS0uAAAAGqSURBVDjLbZSLscQgCEVRGwDTgMEGDPTf27uYz8bdx+wwG0+4fNQQwSRcktvOpaxZ lbSRquZGkjhxvEbFu7v5oO4d/+A9G+PF0vFsZtS13zaqHhfwkYo9wFn3AFNKQuqOuEBIPSC8JxVi FKXUdqktw1hrJkXplLtBSlbjJOSmSDJ+CMUybBepKkw1xQQqmsweRbklqfB9Myuqmw2K3Ao4GMDL 5gNFwiO5+5yKcEwra8Ovog9MLDr3hgQNw2siWbgCJNkCJCl+WcwiAMRnKzeIxgIwImbJsT9RS46t ScSo+gTc3i1SuD4gu7P9gBKqo55z4XdEKLXN9h9gmi33enxJcYwQ+7FZWkGfgPfixyqlfS4cXlfA OU9xb7xKcdVZqGJ/FkB56LPVS4SOssu3RfLqOV3H/BM0G7zWkV7SOwItTN8xxf+AevvqXKqdM6bz 8RXRI6Rj29IKROcof3dw2jLbN+jrwf4A3/8H1U8lvsEtPEvOOKVKtEQUD6e4umoPiLDNF+0zDFf0 AncGXLX5dWFK3SXRmZJxN4SuIAA+v0EJB7vj4jz9+acHhtQfoyVmU+1qV1EAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6 Y3JlYXRlADIwMjItMDktMjdUMTY6NDY6NDErMDA6MDB3WmI9AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAy MDIyLTA5LTI3VDE2OjQ2OjQxKzAwOjAwBgfagQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Nina Simone's _Dont Let Me Be Misunderstood_: "Nobody Knows You When Youre Down And Out" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243759 Archived-At: andr=C3=A9s ram=C3=ADrez writes: > Lars> Skimming this bug report, the conclusion seems to be that > Lars> it's fixed on the "master" > Lars> branch, but it's too large to backport to Emacs 28 (and in > Lars> any case, it's somewhat > Lars> doubtful there will be further Emacs 28 releases), so I'm > Lars> closing this bug report. > > But remember. It was also mentioned 'this issue was going to be > reflected on /etc/PROBLEMS' is that task going to be completed? Like I said, I don't think there's going to be any further Emacs 28 releases, so adding something about this to etc/PROBLEMS on that branch doesn't seem vital.