From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60872: 29.0.60; emacsql broken after Jan 12 change Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:42:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87a62hcjep.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874jspwyrr.fsf@gmail.com> <87mt6hcwcq.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1q12utx.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilh5cnnu.fsf@gmail.com> <83r0vt2rgt.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 60872@debbugs.gnu.org, jonas@bernoul.li, emacs18@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 17 15:43:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnBH-000AUa-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:43:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnB3-00067r-Lc; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnB0-00062w-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:43:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnB0-0005fw-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnB0-0001OO-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60872 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 60872-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60872.16739665365277 (code B ref 60872); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60872) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jan 2023 14:42:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36241 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnAF-0001N2-WA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:42:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:43706) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pHnAE-0001Mq-Cw for 60872@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 09:42:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id r30so6388474wrr.10 for <60872@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:42:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QsZ1Cp5gX9X9T39WsxcgUnLpXSoGU89TtNXusvJWyq0=; b=Lf1iMx3hLaMZWbNzohhaM7/pM3yPnIIEUqrl79wtOo15HbEKV6SJZVm8AVUzSZ52M6 x18piCZ1FyvUvI1bwSmlyOzo+swOODyljNX+dTdRdWkx1+TCu9ZImHWRRb/dl7RkcqVq ISPRhdYHOtCEyBhbsgP2kPWnzpe9Q372pvJcsU0iOaezGRq4M2nKc7ke1j8kUyIvtMZP bGCvq3Gy6VXMo1llLJBa6heuRx0dvCfODiHGpUeiEs9x4Ld6fBczZLW9ueN9InZ01uJU XD80T4nuKSAVhUiBgGzMbcHkqn9oF8h4tqMTt+PAPvc/sNxHcUKjao+6r+7cg26JYE30 qSPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QsZ1Cp5gX9X9T39WsxcgUnLpXSoGU89TtNXusvJWyq0=; b=6xc/FJJKzJd5tQB7Rr7FAksyVwV4eaTeeo+nWkqP/SCgMCGTLluLB9TfJDDeXLgDAo 2KjiHJ5FiXZkFZJUOxVUDfDoQZSMo5xS+u4l2054J+cz1yRLNARLhia5NBstwhz6j5xe /i4+ZbnlYpGg3jBbSjQqjv/h3TFpTfnEvBllH8VuMXjj5+iPBS1hidQGpM0tYzH86aKC BXaYUQfw0+F4vpmgoY5nZ+l6NY2RyjaaT4B+LTu4LaWjnlcf822aq00V4DTpdqYLXQtM OJwqK162SUoQU/BeU0K93WMTjKMS09ihszI+e7MBUP8XlGreXOWKn4yAoSjV1LxUod6b ucHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2krwwzU3oMH0LgY/HPXc1cEnOlaFdLbe/J5iYAouzXU4KciqCSXn xB7zApTlNAimaa7zxcNQ/SjQhX8NClw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXtorvlMGH/VskImGGGmDMiX49cx1KomRj0oojChTlDO3+w/sFqQ9i06daKYboTwUuMyUsPTsw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1006:b0:2b6:daf8:52ad with SMTP id a6-20020a056000100600b002b6daf852admr11349929wrx.52.1673966528097; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:42:08 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5-20020a056000024500b00267bcb1bbe5sm29846960wrz.56.2023.01.17.06.42.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Jan 2023 06:42:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83r0vt2rgt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:58:10 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:253556 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:58:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Is it enough of an error for us to silently replace `utf-8-auto' with >> `utf-8' when it=CA=BCs specified for `coding-system-for-write'? Eli> That's what the bug I fixed effectively did. But no, I don't think Eli> this is something we can do, let alone silently. It could be that Eli> some extremely rare/obscure, but nevertheless legitimate use case = does Eli> really want to produce BOM on encoding. Right. I=CA=BCd suggest a doc change, but there=CA=BCs no documentation for `utf-8-auto' anyway, and perhaps we should avoid drawing attention to it :-) >>=20 >> Either that or use `make-process' directly and pass `:coding' Eli> No, that will suffer from the same problem: Yep Robert --=20