Philip Kaludercic writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> From: Philip Kaludercic >>> Cc: João Távora , >>> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >>> 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org >>> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 19:39:20 +0000 >>> >>> >> Please, in normal non-shouting case, explain to me how you think >>> >> that the behavior of an existing >>> >> command can be changed with "completely separate code". >>> > >>> > I already did: either (1) add a prefix argument to an existing >>> > command, which will then trigger the new behavior, or (2) add a >>> > separate command. >>> >>> Here you have (1): >> >> Thanks. This is almost on-target, but it modifies >> package-compute-transaction. Is that necessary? > > I have found an alternative that doesn't change the way > `package-compute-transaction' works, but requires a small change in > `package-install': I have found a smaller but equivalent change that would also solve the issue: