From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: 64985@debbugs.gnu.org, "Mattias Engdegård" <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#64985: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:32:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5vak40n.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bea099b0-9119-9de4-d2c6-63e619d7a199@gmail.com> (Jim Porter's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2023 11:10:54 -0700")
Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com> writes:
> On 8/1/2023 10:29 AM, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
>> An alternative would be to match against
>> (mapconcat #'identity byte-compile-ignore-files "\\|") ...)
>
> Yeah, I thought about that too. I'm not sure if this would be better
> than using 'seq-some' though; if anyone else has strong opinions on
> this, I'm happy to change the code to whatever the preferred
> implementation is. (I'm also not sure the specific implementation
> matters too much since I doubt this bit is a performance bottleneck.)
The mistake in my previous message was, that I was under the false
assumption that regexp-opt did what Mattias mentioned above (I guess the
reason is that I faintly remembered that the docstring of regexp-opt
mentions (mapconcat 'regexp-quote strings "\\|"), and for some reason I
belive the 'regexp-quote was an 'identity).
In that case we should certainly apply a patch along the lines of what
you suggested, but I would prefer the mapconcat approach, if anything
because of the micro-optimisation of avoiding the overhead for the
generic seq call and having the create and apply closure over and over
again. Not sure if this counts as a strong preference, but it certainly
is a preference.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-01 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 6:20 bug#64985: 29.1; [PATCH] Byte-compilation of packages via package-vc doesn't correctly handle .elpaignore wildcards Jim Porter
2023-08-01 11:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-01 19:22 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-01 12:20 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-08-01 16:10 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-01 16:18 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-01 17:29 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-08-01 18:10 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-01 18:32 ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2023-08-01 19:18 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-01 19:21 ` Philip Kaludercic
2023-08-02 18:08 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-04 19:37 ` bug#64985: 30.0.50; package-recompile-all and package-recompile do not recompile anything, seems related to the patch associated with bug #64985 Vincenzo Pupillo
2023-08-04 20:05 ` Jim Porter
2023-08-05 17:12 ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-08-05 17:16 ` Jim Porter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5vak40n.fsf@posteo.net \
--to=philipk@posteo.net \
--cc=64985@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
--cc=mattias.engdegard@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).