From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68761: [PATCH] Record dependencies in packages installed via package-vc Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:07:43 +0000 Message-ID: <87a5oc5hk0.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87il3eu4ow.fsf@stebalien.com> <87mssdqry2.fsf@posteo.net> <87sf25cpsy.fsf@stebalien.com> <87r0ho68ty.fsf@posteo.net> <86cyt8zb1v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12158"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 68761@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 07 18:09:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPz-0002tL-LQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 18:09:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPn-0005ej-02; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:08:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPk-0005eJ-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPk-0003Xf-Em for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:08:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPx-0003W9-Of for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:09:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 68761-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68761.170732569713472 (code B ref 68761); Wed, 07 Feb 2024 17:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68761) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2024 17:08:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlPE-0003VE-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:08:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:44891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rXlP6-0003Uq-DW for 68761@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F39F240027 for <68761@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:07:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1707325668; bh=8Dp87BEKTHl4y+Z3cluyaurSEZX39Jo4HTz8aCetAcc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=gsZUe07S6ygwgBkz5ZyP3FIs3eKXKf7/Bg7mkZP4BhAB4132U/SYh8cq0x0r0nP3q 5N0vtENCSb+iavw95vLNn6K5JXwFnqxFdEl/BdRfB2lvgBmEYFKHD3mqKYnaJwg03s vNubOggDchHb1hr81Ov7FnUOVKjiZaCNMtbJ9Q6ozuLqtPDOxoe2ZcF3oP5pyv0Uan gBKePGy+IiYJmh+2HRC6tIqeZOu+C7Q/999/zR4fOExdPCOj3UYmrpHMl9850qmE+x 2uCwFhPVkpGVwLuEp7omVDmvqhEp3zTgoSP6/4ai721TjHTFsIEWMHFC4q2Lrmo6xp FxMVLictAfJXw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TVRPv4frJz9rxR; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 18:07:47 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86cyt8zb1v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2024 14:57:48 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279563 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 68761@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 07:18:33 +0000 >> >> Steven Allen writes: >> >> >>> The dependency list wasn't getting recorded in the package's `-pkg.el` file. >> >> >> >> Did you notice this because of some bug or what is the motivation for >> >> this change? I'll certainly look into it, I just wanted some context. >> > >> > I noticed this because I tried to remove "unused" dependencies >> > (package-autoremove) and ended up removing dependencies from my >> > package-vc packages. >> >> That doesn't sound good. Your patch should resolve the issue, and I >> would be inclined to propose applying it to the Emacs 29 branch, if the >> maintainers don't object. > > How serious is the problem? Since it's unlikely there will be any > more Emacs 29.x releases, except if we have some emergency, we should > try to keep the release branch as safe and undiverged from 29.2 as > possible. I wouldn't clarify it as an emergency, at most a regrettable inconvenience. Just to avoid confusion: What branch is the current release branch then?