From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6980: Could goto-char please have its own history list? Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:50:39 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <878vr1rqpc.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313005978 22940 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 19:52:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6980@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 10 21:52:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpi-0006p0-29 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 21:52:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59534 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEph-0002CM-Hb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:52:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpe-0002C9-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpc-0007tJ-Ap for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpc-0007tA-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:52:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEqn-0004br-VF; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6980 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6980-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6980.131300599017650 (code B ref 6980); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2011 19:53:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpx-0004ac-U9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:10 -0400 Original-Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QrEpv-0004aU-4M for 6980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:53:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16306E8088; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0122451C366; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:51:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 4 Sep 2010 00:24:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:54:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49996 Archived-At: > I can't see no reason its history should be mixed by something else. > (More than devel historic reasons ;-) It makes sense to share the same history that contains only numeric values between all commands that use `read-number', like e.g. `goto-line' and `goto-char' (with some changes), because non-numeric values (added to the history from other commands) are useless for such number-reading commands.