From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: bug#10238: R in gnus-summary does not pop a frame like F does Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:56:49 +0100 Message-ID: <878vkvgzm6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87pqe8kbg1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83pqe823oj.fsf@gnu.org> <87vco0ivb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327532265 10469 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2012 22:57:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:57:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10238@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab , ding@gnus.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 25 23:57:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmd-0002ec-BA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:57:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmc-0007RO-Vw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmZ-0007Qy-TC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmY-00081R-HA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:35 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmY-00081J-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBn0-0001fQ-1i; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10238 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 10238-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10238.13275322486367 (code B ref 10238); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10238) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 22:57:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmS-0001ee-1Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40409) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBmR-0001eV-18 for 10238@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:57:27 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-173-241.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.173.241] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqBls-0003Gp-1o; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:56:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wr8fhloi.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:00:13 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RqBls-0003Gp-1o MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1328137012.3127@rQz5tBbegdM6P6bHGJbZEw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56011 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80950 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > But forcing the Gnus developers to use 80 chars in their own work > seems too harsh. I don't mind the 80-character limit. But it can be kinda repetitive if the 80-character summary just repeats a shortened version of the long explanation underneath. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome