From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10844: 24.0.93; Slightly unclear help text about remapped commands Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:43:19 +0800 Message-ID: <878vjrzig8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87boovnpsr.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330141471 1659 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2012 03:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Lars Ingebrigtsen' , 10844@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 04:44:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Yf-0006Aa-Mo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:44:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Yf-00005D-0Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:44:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45475) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Yc-000058-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Yb-0001o4-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:44:26 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Ya-0001ny-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:44:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S18b7-0006Wq-NW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:47:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10844 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10844-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10844.133014157025040 (code B ref 10844); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2012 03:46:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54869 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S18aI-0006Vo-Af for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:46:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52648) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S18aF-0006Vc-C9 for 10844@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from bb116-14-103-36.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.103.36]:55260 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S18Xg-00047t-Dr; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:43:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:37:54 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57205 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > What is wrong with "Its keys are remapped to..." (instead of "It is remapped > to...")? Seems concise and clear, to me. Nothing. I propose this: Its keys are remapped to `ido-kill-buffer'. Without this remapping, it would be bound to C-x k. Any objections?