From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11860: 24.1; Arabic - Harakat (diacritics, short vowels) don't appear Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 22:14:50 +0900 Message-ID: <878vcftmb9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <349071341393469@web30d.yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347455797 12788 80.91.229.3 (12 Sep 2012 13:16:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11860@debbugs.gnu.org, smias@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 15:16:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmo0-0004i4-LI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 15:16:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44463 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmnw-0001Ky-Vg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmnq-0001Ju-1k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmng-0001Si-9j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:25 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmng-0001SX-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmoP-0000MY-Py for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:17:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kenichi Handa Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11860 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11860-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11860.13474557861342 (code B ref 11860); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11860) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2012 13:16:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56208 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmnp-0000Lb-PP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:26 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52665) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmnn-0000LS-4s for 11860@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:58721 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBmn1-0002Dk-UU; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:15:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83k3w0wivf.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:48:36 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64184 Archived-At: In article <83k3w0wivf.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > AFAICS, all Ffont_shape_gstring does is modify the FROM and TO > components of the glyph-string. For this to have any effect on the > screen, these components need to be used by the drawing routines. But > the code in xterm.c and w32term.c that draws the composite characters > (x_draw_composite_glyph_string_foreground) doesn't seem to use these > components. At least for w32term.c, we just draw the glyphs returned > by the shaper, one by one. Each grapheme cluster is a "display element" in the sense of get_next_display_element. get_next_display_element calls next_element_from_composition which calls composition_update_it which updates it->cmp_it.from and it->cmp_it.to from FROM and TO elements for LGLYPH. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org