From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15539: [PATCH] Setting user-emacs-directory Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:03:31 +1100 Message-ID: <878u2akb58.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87wqlqiayq.fsf@carifio.org> <87twlas1s4.fsf@gmail.com> <83bn7ixdo5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456286723 15867 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 04:05:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Alexis , 15539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 05:05:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhK-0005um-5B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:05:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33370 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhJ-0008Dl-GR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:05:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhF-0008By-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:05:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhC-0004AN-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:05:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhC-0004AJ-0z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQhB-0003dx-Qd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15539.145628664713936 (code B ref 15539); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 04:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 04:04:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQgC-0003cD-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:35477) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQgB-0003c2-G9 for 15539@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aYQfn-00083P-Hr; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:03:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83bn7ixdo5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:15:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aYQfn-00083P-Hr MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456891417.53804@jHgTzJ2+AOuIKmXxtP2teA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113653 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Alexis >> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:31:23 +1100 >> >> >> Ping! >> >> Someone on reddit recently enquired about the status of this >> issue: >> >> https://www.reddit.com/r/emacs/comments/44ojpk/interpreting_the_emacs_bug_list_what_was/ >> >> Are there any particular things blocking this patch from being >> applied? > > Frankly, I don't think there are important enough use cases behind > this request to add yet another option that allows to change a > well-established constant. But that's me. (Didn't see any > enthusiastic reactions from others, either. Not sure what that > means.) I think it might make sense... it might make some debugging and testing cases easier, for instance. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no