From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Hong Xu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24879: [PATCH] Point out the default value of FRAME in the `set-face-*' functions. Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 01:17:38 -0700 Message-ID: <878tsyjq71.fsf@topbug.net> References: <1478291350-19807-1-git-send-email-hong@topbug.net> <83k2cjj5ix.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1478333926 10324 195.159.176.226 (5 Nov 2016 08:18:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 08:18:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.50.1 Cc: 24879@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 05 09:18:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wB0-0006KR-A3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 09:18:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42582 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wB3-0006xO-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAw-0006xI-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:18:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAs-0002FB-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAr-0002Eu-Tw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:18:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAr-0002ee-LT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:18:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hong Xu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24879 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 24879-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24879.147833387210190 (code B ref 24879); Sat, 05 Nov 2016 08:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24879) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2016 08:17:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45370 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAi-0002eH-4J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21403) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2wAe-0002e7-Uo for 24879@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:17:49 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (cpe-104-32-170-214.socal.res.rr.com [104.32.170.214]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1478333862423339.0811797038881; Sat, 5 Nov 2016 01:17:42 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <83k2cjj5ix.fsf@gnu.org> X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125368 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2016-11-04 Fri 14:31 GMT-0700, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Do we really need to tell people that an omitted argument defaults to > nil? And if we do, why in this section? Hmm, I didn't notice that we don't say optional args are default to nil in the doc. Never mind, we should close this bug. Despite that, I sort of see some confusion in the doc when mentioning optional args: Sometimes we say "omitted or nil" (e.g., face-all-attributes FRAME arg), sometimes we just say "nil" (e.g., face-attribute FRAME arg). Perhaps more consistency is less confusing. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYHZWiAAoJECZsfTOCL4R4FMwQANniZ2qFJoQ6IuRnmRSuVdQl PFQluLyWKJcESo3haZs4LOdAAWIFonqcRALmHLkLnQOSLsJmgfXfTLtPWCqxR0O+ 5LPNQEG0Uya+k1KZQnFYXjI/Nrlpd9EqebYtq1/0iq8KF93+jmB50fxyWft9tl+L dgc+UQrgd6YeWBePEinnxZdGs4++jkqRl0BgzMdYZe5m9rZD4pSkhaUJ2VWzRaVX 8Bi2SO9plliK3WIWUnkEmp75kl91N/oXY8tSZBisBRpHPyMNgVYYdw5GwQhxRx0+ fckphRxi0eMZtklpTmV8Kh3RAhSuFK2M4PHiJx++RBL+6iZ7NbwrNfw6LEG0Mg7P oZEl96uE/ObVlgTBwN9NGMQoGpAJ3+b2PZHmYHP7FxgTy8DGDbkFa4ZnklVaRO1Z eL3aMfzes+wP710bNa3iYjh6bFFv8K+1aMxUG320KxXuqu0luKYenndfJDJb2rmv LXNUP6MLcxDzmnMmCg3jnMlfT4JZKLhbuMPLi0DLI3xEIf/ZuPOL8LhxXufcW+ib ncCKpn2au8Sf5UVeySQAjGpkCoHpfNyFw0+sam1EFRlJlkpvUOmFQ9CcE2WMxaDY Pcn3gCVkhaQCbUuOAMX93Xp4UuPBhBEHhO/YUgKYJovatCJjjEtAsWjw8s40WSWv Yn/x5OTMpGM9CjKp0JmW =ygP3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--