From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25088: 25.1; feature-unload and reload of cl-defstruct fails Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:04 -0500 Message-ID: <878trnebr3.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87eg1qhpjf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg1qoiiv.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3zwfxjn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83pol8l62j.fsf@gnu.org> <87shpxelkj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83vauth5p9.fsf@gnu.org> <8337hwgsl6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481403914 28416 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2016 21:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:05:14 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 25088@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 22:05:10 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopR-0006iE-L0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 22:05:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53118 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopV-0006NS-Jt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopP-0006Lk-ED for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopK-0004UT-Ce for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopK-0004UM-9b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFopJ-0001KY-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:05:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25088 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25088-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25088.14814038515045 (code B ref 25088); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25088) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2016 21:04:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFooV-0001JE-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:04:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:36030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFooS-0001Iv-E8; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:04:09 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f194.google.com with SMTP id b194so13921295ioa.3; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:04:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZsHNkxri5yUrz+HAhtUoMES8ISMPbnQICG20dphBs2Q=; b=RNO+PlppGGGi4XSUtJF2tCzCqWHWXsoNPA0QkXdx7QURx0a0gwGIY4Nx2uBEnV/Guw sXsh/d90hFdcfgKpsQgDX8ekBZrQoWIofzU4bqyskeY7CPr+vkHVjC+0vAi8NC3LEWGL GzBKFCNkO4Z99TWdsHtXC8YOjmtnwBFbx+nHCAJsaufPp/hl1/6poitJ+5fimsaOvOdl wyE9lG2l9hKec4smStKV7fFJ337X4Uh+tYenhzsuF0e9TYXVH1iANuMLhsdl0ApoYZav zU9vG36eYXORCtzNOxc005vMXyi7rEJz8/o3YxEvcFVPIl3dvOf1bRwvggmJswQRByf3 sPbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ZsHNkxri5yUrz+HAhtUoMES8ISMPbnQICG20dphBs2Q=; b=l0aLt1cyF2SU8U+nHlMO39c16zOP5lwB+X5Qf860TzjwKhIdeX7gyj2MizWETozuwk 2w1n1tc2yOf0f+d+t/qBDm6sAILGxqzaGG5EUBPW1drediUaB3tN96P3jqXvMVqQ4B+S OYX44LseurQBPo4W84iTL+IqhXY8btKqf0g/6wh//HT/VNWE9pwZxGe0BmH0VCp+3GZe 0Tr1MR8az1342ojY53RU/fNR4YGM3hfrqVUKSNlqvlIjG+KdPXh8/vbMad4SyIsYyvcx qOgRjY6CKRvJ96h17Odc/JA4VLDT6T+V7hUWJzF25WEPWYNb5pdVgJt1eAvRmm+e67mH yN+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00p3bXhRAiLwQmZd9pbT3g4He3MeeuNV/c5g3LDa8so+jqFNx5t++26P+CdSClsww== X-Received: by 10.107.29.148 with SMTP id d142mr6410712iod.44.1481403842821; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:04:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n206sm1680830itg.1.2016.12.10.13.04.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:04:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8337hwgsl6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Dec 2016 09:18:29 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126829 Archived-At: tags 25088 fixed close 25088 25.2 quit Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 25088@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 01:33:57 +0200 >> >> On 09.12.2016 10:22, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > What do others think? Is the patch proposed by Noam safe enough for >> > the release branch? Stefan? Dmitry? >> >> Personally, the first option sounds safer for me (for the release >> branch), because the other one might affect many packages and not just >> this one. > > By "first option" do you mean the original patch posted by Noam? > > If so, given a similar opinion from Stefan, let's install that on > emacs-25. Okay, pushed as e4ac4507968b.