From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27658: 26.0.50; response parsing hangs when using tls.el and gnutls-cli.exe on Windows Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:16:26 +0200 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: <878tjr1iqd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bmoqfqz8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87wp7deu0h.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83zic8gwwt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500023841 10853 195.159.176.226 (14 Jul 2017 09:17:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:17:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 27658@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 14 11:17:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwil-0002Ga-MA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:17:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwip-0006W5-CR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwif-0006UX-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwic-0003vk-Fb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwic-0003ve-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwic-0000p9-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27658 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.15000238083142 (code B ref -1); Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2017 09:16:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37739 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiN-0000oc-TN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37542) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiM-0000oO-O0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiG-0003mq-9h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiG-0003mj-63 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiE-0006Eg-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiB-0003km-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42226 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwiB-0003kY-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 05:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dVwi3-000072-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:16:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:oIF3vewcTI/1aeqWtTajNXZvOMU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134537 Archived-At: Richard Copley writes: > On 13 Jul 2017 16:49, "Eli Zaretskii" wrote: >> Are you sure that blog is still accurate? It's quite old, and newer >> versions of the GnuTLS library became meanwhile available. >> > > No doubt some stuff there is no longer valid, but the test case should > succeed. > > I have the latest release of GnuTLS and I did my own testing and > debugging using gnutls-cli.exe before writing this bug report. > > I mentioned the library in my last message. I find (on my own system > today) that the Emacs TLS implementation using the library (in > gnutls.{c,el}) works except that it accepts bad certificates. I don't > think that's stated in the blog at all -- the blog is also mostly > about the implementation based on an external program (in tls.el). I've not been able to locate this blog entry. Could you point me at it? Or provide details of hosts providing bad certificates that emacs accepts when it shouldn't? Perhaps the default settings of GnuTLS in emacs need tweaking. > The possible bug in gnutls.{c,el} or the library itself, the one I was > talking about in my last message, appears to be what is spoken about > here(1) in November 2015 and here(2) in February 2016. As far as I > know it doesn't have an Emacs bug report. > (2) leads to an Emacs bug report that is marked fixed. (1) is unclear to me, I'll have to keep reading. > (1) > https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/18079/emacs-tls-check-is-still-ill-configured > (2) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816063