From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29518: 27.0.50; Compilation errors grab frame focus Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:09 -0500 Message-ID: <878tczpbpu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87609rs323.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87po6nqbwo.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <877esun3t3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mv1qraoq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516018145 4963 195.159.176.226 (15 Jan 2018 12:09:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:09:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29518@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 15 13:09:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3ZO-0000ZH-TV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:08:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3bO-00055h-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:10:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3Yd-0002vd-3t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:08:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3YY-0004Pr-4i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48828) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3YX-0004Pb-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3YX-0000ys-Pm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29518 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 29518-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29518.15160180393723 (code B ref 29518); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29518) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jan 2018 12:07:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3Xq-0000xy-OI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:40087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eb3Xp-0000xl-Jp for 29518@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:07:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 196so616825iti.5 for <29518@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DfTkcE5xfhymR8XEdDTpjCj0hoFEZWKX87Wm3WkbEu4=; b=N0x/Y7ec4Am5diEVB8YoF9vmDCCmWILbhdQ0E1KLfrXIky5Yk2ddWmE1G0lqDD8Srf 130fN0U8e0wiaMXVTuEkZqUMwsEN5elavVJdXUxERQ5BN2o72NiB1PvosJ5FXrb4t5Tu KW+UbNUQdPkTNG1ijuKG4YFSbCSdFUf6ESWeQ1WJY5HXzu2mB/8qeEizvkzGLO9lSY9o WAjc4BkAOClbfJkQwyYi4sy3RCgJXZGJpxI0nrtlMGgXcgvCIkvnU2l2/ttEvMkkEdD/ 95rNOvuXzFaGZhQJrsTXfJ7+ckykD4gQ6PKVx3gtGvg2x0T1fGrSVJf5ILKk4dflepYk b/NQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DfTkcE5xfhymR8XEdDTpjCj0hoFEZWKX87Wm3WkbEu4=; b=pDTkzpTyyqj9mmFwgG5eSc/N/zitR7hOq2y4QuaKl4ZJmbbSY4h//ZLTbly+jW5SUb Rcn8n3FIDfBjhHpjhdWYQ/pnuaeM9HQKs+ND9tJaY60MtA7wrjJaRBmpLi0fLyPFeksM 2LWGLty7e4ocqtO7/MufA0u/VuButD21JTfIAJfD/Otkw5X0Nf6mJ9eVBNW0PDxvtgp+ VaRsqOCHIBEbCigkjDj4ee/JrX2AjvxJeHxfXpZLlGrghHchCjuDP90WIvRDdScf3Ag9 Mzlvg5Yf1PVFEPKrm/kpb1H5Z7xXVhyMjH05mbXeExByUdTxDNi/U0xQw8dpeAUkB2Nf 0IBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfomJFMF1IDpSLVQPbnNX7PSY1ndR6fIDD+YWfzUnXN/Q608udn T3kaYTDwvLxT+7cbZ0k4Q2CGcw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotMEJ8p8fjzHAK4MmGyNHsuk9+7LdwCs1pLdzMvNzM0ToVqk7zw4LHUBjfug3yeAZI6WRUEdA== X-Received: by 10.36.51.201 with SMTP id k192mr6632510itk.71.1516018031876; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l15sm15326990iog.56.2018.01.15.04.07.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:07:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h8rnpwek.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:40:19 -0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:142172 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > On 01/06/18 15:31 PM, Noam Postavsky wrote: >> I can't think of anything. If you M-x debug-on-error RET x-focus-frame >> RET do you get any hits? > > Sorry about the slow response... > > That was an odd recipe, but turning on debug-on-error, then running > several varieties of (x-focus-frame (window-frame)), including focusing > the current frame or other frames, never did anything other than what I > would expect it to -- returning nil when the frame was already focused, > and focusing the frame when it wasn't. Oh, it's odd because I made a thinko, that should have been M-x debug-on-entry ... ^^^^^ > I wasn't able to revert those commits cleanly, and I guess I don't > really think that's the issue. I suspect this is a change in X behavior > (Arch has xorg-server 1.19), and maybe it's not worth chasing after at > this point. Maybe it's enough just to leave this report hanging here, > and see if anyone else runs into it? Hmm, I guess.