From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31179: 26.1; eww leaves processes that slow Emacs Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:18 +0200 Message-ID: <878t9n2pt5.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523888535 21382 195.159.176.226 (16 Apr 2018 14:22:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:22:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Branham Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 16 16:22:10 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f851D-0005PV-JG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:22:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49524 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f853K-0001qN-95 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8537-0001mm-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8534-0001YH-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8533-0001Xv-WB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8533-0002Qw-PY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31179.15238886159296 (code B ref 31179); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 14:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2018 14:23:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56042 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852d-0002Ps-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852b-0002Pj-0r for 31179@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 10:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from 46.67.12.60.tmi.telenormobil.no ([46.67.12.60] helo=corrigan) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f852Y-0003Zu-CP; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:32 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by corrigan with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1f852R-0006n8-AE; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 16:23:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sh7vtfbe.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Branham's message of "Mon, 16 Apr 2018 09:07:49 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:145442 Archived-At: Alex Branham writes: > However, Emacs is slow even after killing the eww buffer. M-x > list-processes shows that several processes are still lying around. Is > there a way to make eww kill these? > > Footnotes: > [1] As an example: http://www.mostlymaths.net/2016/09/more-emacs-configuration-tweaks.html I tried this, and Emacs went back to using 0% CPU after killing off the ewww buffer, so I'm unable to reproduce this. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no