From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37530: 26.1; Tack characters translated incorrectly Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:47 +0200 Message-ID: <878sq9q24o.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83zhiqjom4.fsf@gnu.org> <87muepq2z5.fsf@gnus.org> <838sq9kg4r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="203822"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: mail@axelsvensson.com, 37530@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 27 18:13:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsrw-000qt9-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 18:13:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52992 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDsru-00086L-Qt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:13:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqeF-0005De-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:51:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqeD-00070T-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqeD-00070P-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqeD-0007SW-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37530 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37530-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37530.156959225328659 (code B ref 37530); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37530) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2019 13:50:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqe5-0007SB-JC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:59746) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqe4-0007S3-3m for 37530@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqdz-00023T-Ih; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <838sq9kg4r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:44:52 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167395 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Sorry, this is not enough. We cannot blindly use some alternative > source, especially as the other source was determined to be > inaccurate. How do we know that header file is accurate? (And what > is the license of that file, btw?) The X license. > I'd like someone to do the research and find out why Markus Kuhn's > suggestions were changed. I'd like also to state the source of the > data and the information about the change reason(s) in x-win.el, where > we have the mapping. If somebody wants to do that research, be my guest. I don't see the point -- this is the data the X server uses, so it's authoritative. >> In addition, there's a huge number of keysyms in that file that we do >> not do mappings to characters for. Hm... but those are all over >> #x1000174, so I guess they're mapped to Unicode code points directly? >> >> /* Keysyms directly mapped to Unicode characters. */ >> if (keysym >= 0x01000000 && keysym <= 0x0110FFFF) > > To answer the question, one needs to compare the keysyms with the > corresponding codepoints. If they are identical, then the mapping is > trivial. I don't understand what you mean. The comment says that the keysyms in the 0x01000000 to 0x0110FFFF range map directly to code points. What is there to compare? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no